State of Kansas v. State of Missouri
Decision Date | 23 October 1950 |
Docket Number | O,No. 8,8 |
Citation | 71 S.Ct. 86,95 L.Ed. 628,340 U.S. 859 |
Parties | STATE OF KANSAS, complainant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI. riginal |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Mr. Harold R. Fatzer, Attorney General of Kansas, for complainant.
Messrs. T. E. Taylor, Attorney General of Missouri, and Frank W. Hayes, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant.
Upon consideration of the joint motion of counsel for the parties in this case to amend the decree of this Court, 322 U.S. 654, 64 S.Ct. 1202, 88 L.Ed. 1525, it is ordered that the joint motion be, and it is hereby, granted and the decree is amended to read as follows:
'It is Ordered, Adjudged, and Decreed that the boundary line between the States of Kansas and Missouri, which extends from the intersection of the Missouri River with the 40th parallel, north latitude, southward to the middle of the mouth of the Kaw or Kansas River, be and it is hereby established as the middle line of the main navigable channel of the Missouri River as said river flows throughout its entire course from its intersection with the 40th parallel, north latitude, southward to the middle of the mouth of the Kaw or Kansas River, subject only to changes which may occur by the natural processes of accretion and reliction, but not by avulsion.
'The costs of this suit are equally divided between the two States, Complainant and Defendant.'
To continue reading
Request your trial-
E.E.O.C. v. Townley Engineering & Mfg. Co.
... ... exercise of a religious belief; (2) the existence of a compelling state interest justifying the burden imposed upon the exercise of the religious ... Murphy v. Missouri 814 F.2d 1252 (8th state prison yes ... Dep't of ... ...
-
United States v. Spock
... ... 419, 19 L.Ed.2d 508; Aptheker v. Secretary of State, 1964, 378 U.S. 500, 512-514, 84 S.Ct. 1659, 12 L.Ed.2d 992; Shelton v ... ...
-
Toussie v. United States
...99, 92 L.Ed. 373 (1947); Gara v. United States, 178 F.2d 38, 40 (C.A.6th Cir. 1949), aff'd by an equally divided Court, 340 U.S. 857, 71 S.Ct. 87, 95 L.Ed. 628 (1950); McGregor v. United States, 206 F.2d 583 (C.A.4th Cir. 1953); cf. United States v. Guertler, 147 F.2d 796 (C.A.2d Cir. 1945)......
-
Holdridge v. United States
... ... provides that the trial of a crime "shall be held in the State where * * * committed". The Sixth Amendment guarantees an accused "the ... ...