State of Louisiana v. Aronson
| Decision Date | 01 July 1969 |
| Citation | 254 A.2d 786,54 N.J. 238 |
| Parties | STATE OF LOUISIANA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Sheldon L. ARONSON, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinions are reported at 105 N.J.Super. 410, 252 A.2d 733 (App.Div.1969).
Harold J. Ruvoldt, Jr., Jersey City, for appellant (Ruvoldt & Ruvoldt, Jersey City, attorneys).
William J. Cunnane, Asst. Prosecutor of Hudson County, for respondent (James A. Tumulty, Jr., Prosecutor, attorney).
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, 105 N.J.Super. 410, 252 A.2d 733.
For affirmance: Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN--7.
For reversal: None.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Warner v. Parke
... ... The district court dismissed this case for failure to exhaust state court remedies and, in the alternative, for lack of merit. Warner claims that the State's delay in ... Cf. Louisiana v. Aronson, 252 A.2d 733, 734 (N.J.Ct.App.) (holding that New Jersey qualified as receiving state, ... ...
-
State v. Maglio
... ... requests return of the probationer. Florida also has enacted this statute. Fla.Stat. § 949.07. In Louisiana v. Aronson, 105 N.J.Super. 410, 252 A.2d 733 (App.Div.), aff'd o.b. 54 N.J. 238, 254 A.2d 786 (1969), the court held that N.J.S.A. 2A:168-14(3) ... ...
-
State of Cal. v. Crump
...liberty who violate their release terms. Louisiana v. Aronson, 105 N.J.Super. 410, 413, 252 A.2d 733 (App.Div.), aff'd 54 N.J. 238, 254 A.2d 786 (1969). Subsection 3 of N.J.S.A. 2A:168-14 is the key section to the retaking of alleged probation or parole violators by the sending The duly acc......
- Dean Kaufman, Inc. v. American Mach. & Foundry Co.