State of N.J. v. Rogers
| Decision Date | 25 April 1941 |
| Docket Number | No. 1.,1. |
| Citation | 126 N.J.L. 428,19 A.2d 886 |
| Parties | STATE of New Jersey, Defendant In Error v. George W. ROGERS, Plaintiff in Error. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Error to Supreme Court.
Alexander Simpson, of Jersey City, for plaintiff in error.
Daniel T. O'Regan, of Jersey City, for defendant in error.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court, reported at 122 N.J.L. 490, 6 A.2d 207.
For affirmance: The CHANCELLOR, Justices PARKER, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, and COLIE, and Judges DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, and THOMPSON —13.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
State v. Holland
...* * *' Commissioner of Public Works v. Cities Service Oil Co., 308 Mass. 349, 32 N.E.2d 277, 283. And see State v. Rogers, 122 N.J.L. 490, 6 A.2d 207, Id., 126 N.J.L. 428, 19 A.2d 886. Counsel cites State v. Ju Nun, 53 Or. 1, 97 P. 96, 98 P. 513, 514, to the following '* * * the repeal of a......
-
State v. Griffith
...84 N.J.L. 561, 563, 87 A. 118, 119 (Sup.Ct.1913); State v. Rogers, 122 N.J.L. 490, 6 A.2d 207 (Sup.Ct.1939); affirmed 126 N.J.L. 428, 19 A.2d 886 (E. & A.1941). A person accused of crime is only entitled to counsel to aid him in his defense, not to save him from his voluntary acts. State v.......
-
State v. Monia
...which failed so to comply with the statute were not considered. Cf. State v. Rogers, 122 N.J.L. 490, 493, 6 A.2d 207, affirmed 126 N.J.L. 428, 19 A.2d 886. By the amendment, the trial judge continues to be obliged to settle a bill of exceptions but is not required to sign and seal each exce......
-
Martin v. Bird, 240.
...19 A.2d 886126 N.J.L. 415 ... J. H. Thayer MARTIN, State Tax Commissioner of the State of New Jersey, Defendant-Petitioner v. Elias H. BIRD and George M ... ...