State of N.J. v. Bright

Citation12 A.2d 677,124 N.J.L. 451
Decision Date25 April 1940
Docket NumberNo. 29.,29.
PartiesSTATE of New Jersey, Defendant-in-Error v. Charles BRIGHT, Jr., Plaintiff-in-Error.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

Appeal from Supreme Court.

David L. Horuvitz, of Bridgeton, for plaintiff-inerror.

W. A. W. Grier, Prosecutor of the Pleas, of Salem, for defendant-inerror.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal challenges certain rulings of the trial court respecting the admission or rejection of evidence, the legal propriety of a portion of the charge to the jury, the refusal of the trial court to direct a verdict of acquittal and other incidental matter. Upon consideration thereof we are satisfied that none of the matters complained of resulted in harmful error.

The judgment, 123 N.J.L. 435, 8 A.2d 904, appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

For affirmance: Justices CASE, BODINE, HEHER, and PERSKIE, and Judges HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, and HAGUE —10.

For reversal: Justice PARKER—1.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT