State Of N.J. v. Wesler, A-32.
Decision Date | 08 November 1948 |
Docket Number | No. A-32.,A-32. |
Parties | STATE of New Jersey, respondent, v. Morris WESLER and William Tomash, appellants. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
On appeal from a judgment of the former Supreme Court whose opinion is reported at 137 N.J.L. 311, 59 A.2d 834.
Harry Coulomb and Coulomb, McAllister & Hunter, all of Atlantic City, for appellants.
David R. Brone and Lewis P. Scott, Pros. of Atlantic County, both of Atlantic City, for respondent.
The judgments will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Case in the court below.
For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT and Justices OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD and ACKERSON-4.
For reversal: Justice HEHER-1.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Sinnott
...v. State, 195 Wis. 181, 217 N.W. 697 (Wis.Sup.Ct.1928). People v. Cowles, 246 Mich. 429, 224 N.W. 387 (Mich.Sup.Ct.1929); State v. Wesler, 1 N.J. 58, 61 A.2d 746 (1948); Miller v. State, 49 Okl.Cr. 133, 295 P. 403 (Okl.Cr.Ct.1930). Compare Lindsey v. U.S., This article recognizes that clini......
-
United States v. Hiss
...question had been presented, it would have been admissible. People v. Cowles, 1929, 246 Mich. 429, 224 N.W. 387; see also State v. Wesler, 1948, 1 N.J. 58, 61 A.2d 746; Ellarson v. Ellarson, 1921, 198 App.Div. 103, 107, 190 N.Y.S. 6; Jeffers v. State, 145 Ga. 74, 88 S.E. 571; Bouldin v. Sta......