State Of North Carolina v. Hurst, No. 363A04-2.
| Docket Nº | No. 363A04-2. |
| Citation | 698 S.E.2d 664, 364 N.C. 244 |
| Case Date | June 16, 2010 |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina |
364 N.C. 244
698 S.E.2d 664
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Jason Wayne HURST.
No. 363A04-2.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
June 16, 2010.
Valerie B. Spalding, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.
Robert H. Hale, Jr., Daniel James Dolan, for Jason Wayne Hurst.
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 22nd of June 2009 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Randolph County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:
“Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of June 2010.”
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 practice notes
-
Hurst v. Branker, 1:10CV725
...[in a written order]." (Id.) The Supreme Court of North Carolina denied review of the state superior court's MAR orders. State v. Hurst, 364 N.C. 244, 698 S.E.2d 664 (2010).THE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL The Supreme Court of North Carolina summarized the evidence presented at Petitioner's trial as f......
-
Hurst v. Branker, 1:10CV725
...of his MAR and his Motion for Discovery by Depositions (see State's Ex. CC at 53-62),11 which that court summarily denied, State v. Hurst, 364 N.C. 244, 698 S.E.2d 664 (2010).Proceedings in this Court On September 20, 2010, Petitioner (through counsel) commenced the instant federal case by ......
-
Hurst v. Thomas, 1:10CV725
...Entry 6-3.) Petitioner then sought review in the North Carolina Supreme Court, which that court denied on June 16, 2010. State v. Hurst, 364 N.C. 244, 698 S.E.2d 664 (2010). On September 20, 2010, Petitioner (through Hale and Dolan) commenced this case by filing a Petition under 28 U.S.C. §......
-
Hurst v. Lassiter, 1:10CV725
...5.) The MAR court denied Claim I (Doc. 6-1 at 5-7), and the North Carolina Supreme Court summarily denied further review, State v. Hurst, 364 N.C. 244, 698 S.E.2d 664 (2010). The Magistrate Judge presented a thorough review of the MAR proceeding in the Recommendation (Doc. 53 at 11-20) and ......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Hurst v. Branker, 1:10CV725
...[in a written order]." (Id.) The Supreme Court of North Carolina denied review of the state superior court's MAR orders. State v. Hurst, 364 N.C. 244, 698 S.E.2d 664 (2010).THE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL The Supreme Court of North Carolina summarized the evidence presented at Petitioner's trial as f......
-
Hurst v. Branker, 1:10CV725
...of his MAR and his Motion for Discovery by Depositions (see State's Ex. CC at 53-62),11 which that court summarily denied, State v. Hurst, 364 N.C. 244, 698 S.E.2d 664 (2010).Proceedings in this Court On September 20, 2010, Petitioner (through counsel) commenced the instant federal case by ......
-
Hurst v. Thomas, 1:10CV725
...Entry 6-3.) Petitioner then sought review in the North Carolina Supreme Court, which that court denied on June 16, 2010. State v. Hurst, 364 N.C. 244, 698 S.E.2d 664 (2010). On September 20, 2010, Petitioner (through Hale and Dolan) commenced this case by filing a Petition under 28 U.S.C. §......
-
Hurst v. Lassiter, 1:10CV725
...5.) The MAR court denied Claim I (Doc. 6-1 at 5-7), and the North Carolina Supreme Court summarily denied further review, State v. Hurst, 364 N.C. 244, 698 S.E.2d 664 (2010). The Magistrate Judge presented a thorough review of the MAR proceeding in the Recommendation (Doc. 53 at 11-20) and ......
Request a trial to view additional results