State of NY v. DAIRYLEA CO-OP. INC., 81 Civ. 1891.

Decision Date25 May 1982
Docket NumberNo. 81 Civ. 1891.,81 Civ. 1891.
Citation547 F. Supp. 306
PartiesSTATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. DAIRYLEA COOPERATIVE INC., et al., Defendants.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

Bonnie Wittner, Asst. Atty. Gen. of State of N. Y., New York City, for Attorney General of State of N. Y.

Stanley M. Kolber, Botein, Hays, Sklar & Herzberg, New York City, for Dellwood Foods, Inc.

Barry I. Slotnick, New York City, for Hygrade Milk & Cream Co., Inc., William G. Meyer, Jimmy Stabile (salesman), Ralph Gaeta, Constantino Gil.

Allan A. Pines, Michael G. Shannon, Burns, Jackson, Summit, Rovins & Spitzer, New York City, for Gold Medal Farms, Inc., Martin Fromm.

Robert Marcus, Marcus & Katz, Mineola, N. Y., for Manchester Cream Co., Inc., Hygrade Milk & Cream Co., Inc.

Robert V. Marrow, Salon, Marrow & Dyckman, New York City, for Meadowbrook Farms, Inc., Carlos Ramos, Steven Schwartz (salesman).

Joseph J. Cella, Barry Ivan Slotnick, New York City, for Emmanuel Mesh (Crown Cream), Jesse Miccio (Mesh).

Michael Santangelo, New York City, for Irving Ravens (Puretest), Tip Top.

M. Nelson Zapata, New York City, for Puretest Milk Co., Inc. & Tip Top.

Milton Gould, Shea & Gould, New York City, for William Schwartz (Meadowbrook President).

Raymond F. Narral, New York City, for Irving Seidenberg (Gold Medal salesman), John Cancellieri (Gold Medal, Dairylea).

Norman Ostrow, Grand & Ostrow, New York City, for Herbert E. Whitehead (Dellwood Vice President).

Patrick L. Wynne, New York City, for Morris Park Farms, Inc., Jerome Zelinsky (Vice President).

Jonathan L. Rosner, New York City, for Sidney Adler (Dellwood VP).

Frederick P. Hafetz, Goldman & Hafetz, New York City, for Salvatore Fasulo (Dairylea).

Oscar A. Bloustein, White Plains, N. Y., for Joseph V. Guiliano (Meadowbrook).

John Laurence Kase, Kase & Drucker, Mineola, N. Y., for George Holsten (Manchester— Treasurer).

Stanley Solomon, New York City, for George Mas (Puretest, Dairylea).

Stephen Angel, Marcia Hefter, Tooker, Esseks, Hefter, Cuddy & Angel, Riverhead, N. Y., for Beyer Farms, Inc.

Susan G. Rosenthal, Winick & Rich, P. C., New York City, for Elmhurst Milk & Cream Co.

William V. Alesi, Suozzi, English, Cianciulli & Peirez, Mineola, N. Y., for Tri Eagle Dairy, Inc.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

OWEN, District Judge.

Defendants Dairylea and its employee Fasulo, who it is alleged have wrongfully charged inflated prices for milk as part of conspiracy in violation of the anti-trust laws, seek to settle the action. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 15c(c), they and plaintiff, the State of New York, ask preliminary approval of their proposed settlement agreement. (Plaintiff represents the parens patriae class in this action.) Plaintiff also seeks approval of the form and manner of notice of the settlement agreement to that class. Because on this record I find that the proposed settlement agreement is not "fair" and "adequate" as to all interested parties, see e.g., In re Montgomery County Real Estate Antitrust Litigation, 83 F.R.D. 305, 315 (D.Md. 1979), I decline to approve it. I need not, therefore, address plaintiff's second request.

In more detail, the motion before me today arises out of a suit filed by the New York State Attorney General pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 15c(a) alleging that defendants Dairylea and Fasulo, among numerous other defendants, conspired to fix the wholesale price of milk, to fix the retail price of milk, and to allocate retail customers. On May 28, 1981, plaintiff consented to the settlement of its action against Dairylea and Fasulo in consideration for certain undertakings by these two defendants.

The substance of this proposed settlement agreement is as follows. In consideration for plaintiff's termination of its action, Dairylea proposed:

(1) to make payments totalling $1,000,000 as follows: at intervals over the course of the next five years, Dairylea is to make $250,000 in direct payments to governmental entities. Moreover, over four years Dairylea is to expend a total of $750,000 in connection with the distribution of "cents-off coupons" redeemable for discounts on Dairylea products. These coupons would be distributed by being printed on the packaging of Dairylea milk and would be redeemable for a discount on a subsequent purchase of Dairylea milk or milk-products.
(2) to refrain from conspiring to fix the wholesale or retail price of milk or to allocate customers or territories for the sale of milk; and
(3) to allow plaintiff reasonable access in
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • People v. Elmhurst Milk & Cream Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • October 8, 1982
    ...been indicted in Bronx County, with violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act (15 U.S.C. § 1) and the Donnelly Act. (State v. Dairylea Cooperative, Inc., et al., 547 F.Supp. 306.) The complaint, which was amended on January 30, 1982 to include as defendants all the corporations and individual......
  • State of N.Y. v. Dairylea Co-op. Inc.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • January 12, 1983
    ...FEINBERG, Chief Judge, and KAUFMAN and CARDAMONE, Circuit Judges. IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge: This appeal from Judge Owen's order, 547 F.Supp. 306, refusing to sanction a proposed settlement agreement between the State of New York and Dairylea Cooperative Inc. 1 presents an issue of f......
  • Buchet v. ITT Consumer Financial Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota
    • February 24, 1994
    ...WL 153, at *2 (D.Conn. Oct. 24, 1983) (approving class action settlement involving coupons for new products); New York v. Dairylea Coop. Inc., 547 F.Supp. 306, 307 (S.D.N.Y.1982) (refusing to approve class action settlement involving cash expenditures and discount coupons for dairy products......
1 books & journal articles
  • Introduction
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library State Antitrust Practice and Statutes (FIFTH). Volume I
    • December 9, 2014
    ...¶ 66,928 (M.D. Fla. 1985); In re Mid-Atl. Toyota Antitrust Litig., 564 F. Supp. 1379, 1383 (D. Md. 1983); New York v. Dairylea Coop., 547 F. Supp. 306 (S.D.N.Y. 1982); In re Montgomery County Real Estate Antitrust Litig., 83 F.R.D. 305, 315 n.9 (D. Md. 1979). 43. See , e.g. , Mississippi ex......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT