State of S.D. v. U.S. Dept. of Interior, 94-2344SDRC

Decision Date19 December 1996
Docket NumberNo. 94-2344SDRC,94-2344SDRC
PartiesSTATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA; City of Oacoma, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR; Eddie F. Brown, Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs; Jerry Jaeger, Acting Area Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Appellees. White Earth Band of Chippewa Indians; Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, also known as Lower Brule Tribe of Sioux Indians; Three Affiliated Tribes, of the Fort Berthold Reservation; The Miccosukee Tribe, of Indians of Florida; The Menominee Indian Tribe, of Wisconsin; The Seminole Tribe, of Florida; The Narragansett Indian Tribe; Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, of the Flathead Reservation; Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians; Nez Perce Tribe; Spokane Tribe of Indians; Stockbridge-Munsee Band of Mohican Indians; Winnebago Tribe, of Nebraska; Jicarilla Apache Tribe; Pueblo of Laguna; Pueblo of Santa Ana; Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes, of the Fort Peck Reservation; Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe; Ho-Chunk Nation; Lac Du Flambeau Band, of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians; Puyallup Tribe of Indians; St. Croix Band of Chippewa Indians; Standing Rock Sioux Tribe; Yankton Sioux Tribe; Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux (Dakota) Community; Prairie Island Indian Community Reservation; The Upper Sioux Community; The Grand Portage Band, of Chippewa; Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians; Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe; Minnesota Chippewa Tribe; Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians; San Manuel Band of Mission Indians; Cherokee Nation; Chippewa-Cree Tribe of the Rockyboy's Reservation; Crow Creek Sioux Tribe; Hannahville Indian Community; Mashantucket Pequot Tribe; Oglala Sioux Tribe; Rosebud Sioux Tribe; Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah; National Congress of American Indians; Amici Curiae, State of Connecticut, acting by its Attorney General, Richard Blumenthal; State of Arizona, acting by its Attorney General, Grant Woods; State of California, acting by its Attorney General, Daniel Lungren; State of Florida, acting by its Attorney General, Robert A. Butterworth; State of Idaho, acting
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • South Dakota v. U.S. Dept. of Interior, No. CIV. 00-3026-RHB.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Dakota
    • April 19, 2004
    ...Circuit recalled its mandate, vacated its earlier judgment, and remanded the matter to this Court. South Dakota v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 106 F.3d 247 (8th Cir.1996). On December 24, 1996, this Court, complying with the Circuit Court's order, remanded the matter to the Agency ......
  • McAlpine v. U.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • May 7, 1997
    ...judgment vacated and remanded, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 286, 136 L.Ed.2d 205 (1996), mandate recalled and opinion vacated by 106 F.3d 247 (8th Cir.1996), the Eighth Circuit confronted the question of whether the Secretary's decision to acquire land in trust for the Lower Brule Tribe of the ......
1 books & journal articles
  • CHAPTER 1 EVOLUTION OF FEDERAL PUBLIC LAND AND RESOURCES LAW
    • United States
    • FNREL - Special Institute Public Land Law II (FNREL)
    • Invalid date
    ...69 F.3d 878 (8th Cir. 1995), cert. granted and vacated, 117 S. Ct. 286 (1996). [345] South Dakota v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 106 F.3d 247 (8th Cir. 1996). [346] Robertson v. Seattle Audubon Soc'y, 503 U.S. 429 (1992). See also Mount Graham Coalition v. Thomas, 53 F.3d 970 (9th ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT