State of Wisconsin v. Minnesota Mining Mfg Co, 48

Decision Date16 December 1940
Docket NumberNo. 48,48
CitationState of Wisconsin v. Minnesota Mining Mfg Co, 311 U.S. 452, 61 S.Ct. 253, 85 L.Ed. 274 (1940)
PartiesSTATE OF WISCONSIN et al. v. MINNESOTA MINING & MFG. CO
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

See 312 U.S. 712, 61 S.Ct. 444, 85 L.Ed. —-.

Messrs. Harold H. Persons and James Ward Rector, both of Madison, Wis., for petitioners.

Mr. John L. Connolly, of St. Paul, Minn., for respondent.

Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case, involving another application of the Wisconsin Privilege Dividend Tax considered in Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co., 311 U.S. 435, 61 S.Ct. 246, 85 L.Ed. 267, decided this day, is governed by that decision except for a contention made by this respondent but not pressed here in Penney's case.

The Commerce Clause is invoked. But it is too late in the day to find offense to that Clause because a state tax is imposed on corporate net income of an interstate enterprise which is attributable to earnings within the taxing state, Matson Navigation Co. v. State Board, 297 U.S. 441, 56 S.Ct. 553, 80 L.Ed. 791. That liability for such a tax is made contingent upon later happenings, as in the circumstances of the present case, makes no difference.

Reversed and remanded.

The CHIEF JUSTICE, Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS, Mr. Justice...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
16 cases
  • Northwestern States Portland Cement Company v. State of Minnesota Williams v. Stockham Valves and Fittings, Inc
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • February 24, 1959
    ...Co. v. Chamberlain, supra, 254 U.S. at page 119, 41 S.Ct. at page 46. As was said in State of Wisconsin v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co., 1940, 311 U.S. 452, 453, 61 S.Ct. 253, 254, 85 L.Ed. 274, 'it is too late in the day to find offense to that (commerce) Clause because a state tax is impos......
  • Spector Motor Service v. Walsh
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • March 18, 1944
    ...derived from within the state, Shaffer v. Carter, 252 U.S. 37, 57, 40 S.Ct. 221, 227, 64 L.Ed. 445; State of Wisconsin v. Minnesota Mining Co., 311 U.S. 452, 61 S.Ct. 253, 85 L.Ed. 274; cf. People of State of New York ex rel. Cohn v. Graves, 300 U.S. 308, 57 S.Ct. 466, 81 L.Ed. 666, 108 A.L......
  • Armco Steel Corp. v. State
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • October 1, 1959
    ...Typewriter Co. v. Chamberlain, supra, 254 U.S. at page 119, 41 S.Ct. at page 46. As was said in Wisconsin v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co., 1940, 311 U.S. 452, 453, 61 S.Ct. 253, 254, 85 L.Ed. 274, 'It is too late in the day to find offense to that [commerce] Clause because a state tax is imp......
  • Commonwealth v. Eastern Motor Exp., Inc.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • December 30, 1959
    ... ... for State purposes by imposing a property tax on the net ... incomes ... States Portland Cement Company v. Minnesota (Williams v ... Stockham Valves & Fittings, Inc.), 358 ... * ... * *' State of Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co., ... 1940, 311 U.S. 435, 445, 61 ... v ... Blodgett, 1928, 276 U.S. 245, 48 S.Ct. 230, 72 L.Ed. 551 and ... International Shoe Co. v ... 165]. As was said in Wisconsin v ... Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co., 1940, 311 U.S. 452, 453, 61 ... S.Ct. 253, ... ...
  • Get Started for Free