State of Wisconsin v. State of Illinois State of Michigan v. State of Illinois State of New York v. State of Illinois

Decision Date22 April 1929
Docket NumberNo. 7,No. 12,No. 11,7,11,12
Citation73 L.Ed. 976,279 U.S. 821,49 S.Ct. 349
PartiesThe STATE OF WISCONSIN et al., complainants, v. The STATE OF ILLINOIS et al.; STATE OF MICHIGAN, complainant, v. The STATE OF ILLINOIS et al.; STATE OF NEW YORK, complainant. v. STATE OF ILLINOIS et al. , original. , original. , original
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

and

Messrs. Wm. J. Morgan and Ralph M. Hoyt, both of Milwaukee, Wis., Herman L. Ekern, of Madison, Wis., C. L. Hilton, of St. Paul, Minn., E. C. Turner and C. C. Crabbe, both of Columbus, Ohio, Geo. W. Woodruff, of Philadelphia, Pa., Newton D. Baker, of Cleveland, Ohio, John W. Reynolds, of Madison, Wis., R. T. Jackson, of Mineral Point, Wis., G. A. Youngquist, of St. Paul, Minn., for the State of Wisconsin and others.

Messrs. Edw. J. Brundage, Wm. F. Mulvihill, Morton S. Cressy, Edmond D. Adcock, Oscar E. Carlstrom, H. A. Brouillet, Jas. Hamilton Lewis, Geo. F. Barrett, and Louis J. Behan, all of Chicago, Ill., J. T. Kenworthy and Cyrus E. Dietz, both of Rock Island, Ill., Hugh S. Johnson, of Springfield, Ill., Maclay Hoyne, of Chicago, Ill., and James M. Beck, of Washington, D. C., for the State of Illinois and others.

Messrs. Wilber M. Brucker, Atty. Gen., A. B. Dougherty, William W. Potter, and Arthur E. Kidder, all of Lansing, Mich., for the State of Michigan.

Messrs. Hamilton Ward, Atty. Gen., of New York City, Albert J. Danaher, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Albany, N. Y., Albert Ottinger, of New York City, R. J. Le Boeuf, Jr., of Albany, N. Y., and Nathan L. Miller, of New York City, for the State of New York.

Messrs. North T. Gentry, of Columbia, Mo., Daniel N. Kirby, of St. Louis, Mo., and Cornelius Lynde, of Chicago, Ill., for intervener State of Missouri.

Mr. F. M. Thompson, of Nashville, Tenn., for intervener State of Tennessee.

Mr. F. E. Daugherty, of Louisville, Ky.,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
29 cases
  • State v. State
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • January 20, 2010
    ...73 S.Ct. 726, 97 L.Ed. 1348 (1953); Nebraska v. Wyoming, 296 U.S. 548, 56 S.Ct. 176, 80 L.Ed. 388 (1935); Wisconsin v. Illinois, 279 U.S. 821, 49 S.Ct. 349, 73 L.Ed. 976 (1929). And we have strongly intimated in other decisions (albeit in dictum) that private entities can rarely, if ever, i......
  • State v. Lane
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • May 4, 1989
    ... ... and messages within the state of New York to inform the participants about their roles in ... for the definition of "partly" in the Illinois statute or the limitation in the California ... ...
  • United States v. Union Trust Company
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • March 28, 1956
    ... ... person to the Baltimore Regional Office to state that they had effected a reconciliation. The ... National City Bank of New York, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1939, 28 F.Supp. 144; United States ... ...
  • Najera v. Southern Pac. Co.
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • April 27, 1961
    ... ... a question of first impression in this state: is a railroad employer liable to an injured ...         As the Illinois court suggests, the primary concern of the ... decisions, those of Kansas, Missouri and New York, pre-date Lillie and are therefore of doubtful ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT