State Police Litigation, In re
Decision Date | 03 July 1996 |
Docket Number | D,No. 886,886 |
Citation | 88 F.3d 111 |
Parties | In re STATE POLICE LITIGATION. CONNECTICUT CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, Joseph Keefe, Individually and as President of Connecticut Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, John R. Gulash, William J. Sweeney, Denise Derby, Donald Couture, Timothy B. Young, Roderick Young, Barbara Schuyler, Conrad Seifert, Attorney, William Gerace, Attorney, Martin Minella, Attorney, William Dow, Jay Martin Sulzach, Attorney, Robert A. Skovgaard, Charles E. Skovgaard, James M. Higgins, Attorney, Kevin O'Brien, Attorney, Timothy Moynihan, Attorney, Mark Shapera, Joseph J. Masler, Paul Arvai, Eva Belline, Joseph Belline, Lisa M. Belline, Ismael Santiago, James C. Carbone, Frank Gonzalez, Jr., Jeffrey Irwin, David Garfield, John McBride, William Bruce, Theodore L. Callands, John David Panula, III, Carolyn M. Capozziello, Thomas W. Capozziello, A. Capozziello, Myron J. Stephenson, George Whitehead, Joseph A. Rich, Sr., Robert A. Rosa, Sonja Van Valkenburgh, Michael J. Mezzatesta, Susan Pregler, Richard Reardon, Manuel E. Ferriera, Gregory Hudson, Mathew A. Capozziello, Tom Ciarolo, David White, Rafael A. Cabrera, Michael West, Richard G. Paradis, Jeffrey Membrino, Daniel Membrino, Lorenzo Santropietro, Gene Mancino, Harold D. Nichols, Mark Nichols, Lisa Anderson, Raymond Mikolinski, Lorraine Mikolinski, William C. Rado, Charles W. Kasmer, James Reardon, Daniel Ferriera, Joseph A. Rich, Jr., Barbara Rich, John M. Lebel, Tonya Miller, Bryan S. Golemowski, David R. Capasso, Raymond Povinelli, Luke Warner, Charles F. Kimms, James E. Jones, Paul A. Larosa, James Masler, Adelgard L. Masler, Michael P. Pane, Carmelina L. Pane, Keith W. Rado, Ralph Shores, Joseph W. Miron, Adam J. Soares, Steve Hanford, Wayne M. Christinat, Kent Kelsey, Daniel Elsbree, William Parker, Deborah Arvai, Domenic Santilli, Brian Panetta, Stephanie Weinburg, David Weinberg, Allen D'Antinio, Thomas Gahan, Steven W. Krauss, Betty Little, David Little, Robert Little, James P. Janulet, Jeffrey Fluery, Glenn E. Coe, An |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Aaron S. Bayer, Deputy Attorney General, Hartford, Connecticut (Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General of Connecticut, Henri Alexandre, Carolyn K. Querijero, Jane R. Rosenberg, Assistant Attorneys General, Hartford, Connecticut, John W. Sitarz, Cooney, Scully & Dowling, Hartford, Connecticut, on the brief), for Defendants-Appellants.
Christopher D. Bernard, Bridgeport, Connecticut (Koskoff, Koskoff & Bieder, Bridgeport, Connecticut, Garrett M. Moore, Judith A. Mauzaka, Moore & O'Brien, Cheshire, Connecticut, on the brief), for Plaintiffs-Appellees and Intervenors-Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Before: KEARSE, MAHONEY and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
To continue reading
Request your trial- Sky Cable, LLC v. Coley
-
Milner v. Duncklee
...was within the scope of the established prohibition.'" LaBounty v. Coughlin, 137 F.3d 68, 73 (2d Cir.1998) (quoting In re State Police Litig., 88 F.3d 111, 123 (2d Cir.1996)). Determining whether or not a right is clearly established at any given time, depends in large part, on how that rig......
-
Ramsey v. Busch
... ... Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney General for the State of New York, Joseph F. Reina, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel, Buffalo, New York, for ... Brown v. City of Oneonta, N.Y. Police Dep't., 106 F.3d 1125, 1131 (2d Cir.1997). If it was objectively reasonable for the defendant to ... their conduct was within the scope of the established prohibition." In re State Police Litigation, 88 F.3d 111, 123 (2d Cir.1996). The question thus remains whether Defendants' actions in failing ... ...
-
Baker v. Willett
...their position would not have understood that their conduct was within the scope of the established prohibition." In re State Police Litig., 88 F.3d 111, 123 (2d Cir.1996). The Eighth Amendment prohibits the use of excessive force upon a prisoner. At the time of the alleged incident, it was......