In re Brady's Estate
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM. |
| Citation | In re Brady's Estate, 254 N.Y. 590 (N.Y. 1930) |
| Decision Date | 08 July 1930 |
| Parties | In the Matter of the Estate of JAMES C. BRADY, Deceased. THE STATE TAX COMMISSION, Appellant; NICHOLAS F. BRADY et al., as Executors et al., Respondents. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department (228 App. Div. 56, 239 N. Y. S. 5), entered January 27, 1930, which reversed a decree of the Albany County Surrogate's Court adjudging that certain shares of stock constituted a part of the decedent's estate and had not been given by him in his lifetime to his wife and children.
Seth T. Cole and James A. Quinn, both of Albany, for appellant State Tax Commission.
Neile F. Towner, of Albany, for respondents executors.
Nathan L. Miller, Harold Otis, and Robert A. Fulwiler, Jr., all of New York City, for respondents Helen M. Brady and others.
Edward J. O'Connell, of Albany, for respondents Ruth Brady and others.
Order affirmed, with costs.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Cartall v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
...And if the donor constitutes himself trustee for the donee, no further delivery is required. In re Brady's Estate, 239 N.Y.S. 5, affirmed, 254 N.Y. 590. (10) Where the record practically all one way with respect to issue presented, the Supreme Court will give deference to the chancellor's f......
-
Yandell v. Wilson
... ... destroyed by donor's unauthorized act, a suit against ... executor of the donor's estate, commenced within 10 years ... after donor had waived priority of the lien, was not barred ... by limitations, since donor's action created a trust ... ...
-
Elyachar v. Gerel Corp.
... ... After the war, Colonel Elyachar returned to his real estate business in New York. Over the years he built and managed several valuable properties. He also built a family — twin sons, the plaintiffs in this ... ...
-
Gruen v. Gruen
...of some interest and the gift is effective immediately (see, Matter of Brady, 228 App.Div. 56, 60, 239 N.Y.S. 5, affd. no opn. 254 N.Y. 590, 173 N.E. 879; In re Sussman's Estate, 125 N.Y.S.2d 584, 589-591, affd. no opn. 283 App.Div. 1051, 134 N.Y.S.2d 586, Matter of Valentine, 122 Misc. 486......