State v. Aaron
| Decision Date | 04 November 2003 |
| Citation | 266 Conn. 924,835 A.2d 474 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. AARON L. |
David T. Grudberg, in support of the petition.
Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 79 Conn. App. 397 (AC 22450), is granted, limited to the following issues:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (1) there was sufficient evidence to allow the admission of a certain 1992 incident as uncharged misconduct; and (2) the statements of the defendant's two year old daughter to her mother were admissible under residual exceptions to the hearsay rule?"
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17089.
To continue reading
Request your trial
53 cases
- Parker v. Zoning Comm'n of the Town of Wash.
- Wheelan v. City of Gautier
-
State v. Aaron L., (SC 17089).
...rule; and (2) there was sufficient evidence to allow the admission of a 1992 incident as uncharged misconduct?5 State v. Aaron L., 266 Conn. 924, 835 A.2d 474 (2003). We answer the certified questions in the affirmative and, therefore, we affirm the judgment of the Appellate The jury reason......
-
Parker v. Zoning Comm'n of Town of Wash.
... ... 796, 818 A.2d 72 ... (2003), this court, citing a noted treatise on land use in ... this state, observed that, ‘‘[t]he term ... nonconforming uses is often used without consideration as to ... what aspect of the use of property ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results