State v. Acker
| Docket Number | SCWC-30205 |
| Decision Date | 14 February 2014 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
21 cases
-
State v. Herbert
...else entirely.United States v. Griffin, 66 F.3d 68, 70 (5th Cir.1995) (citation and footnotes omitted); accord State v. Acker, 133 Hawai'i 253, 327 P.3d 931, 960 (2014) ; see also United States v. Lacouture, 495 F.2d 1237, 1240 (5th Cir.1974) (stating that right to compulsory process would ......
-
Stangel v. Wead
...violated a defendant's right "to present any and all competent evidence in their defense." Id. (quoting State v. Acker, 133 Haw. 253, 301, 327 P.3d 931, 979 (Haw. 2014) (brackets omitted)). Abion also reasoned that the exclusion violated a recently-recognized due process right under the Haw......
-
State v. Known
... ... 17-0000660, 147 Hawai‘i 171, 184-85, 465 P.3d 618, 631-32 (Haw. June 4, 2020) ; Lavoie , 145 Hawai‘i at 414, 453 P.3d at 234 ; State v. Fukusaku , 85 Hawai‘i 462, 497, 946 P.2d 32, 67 (1997) ; State v. Schnabel , 127 Hawai‘i 432, 439, 279 P.3d 1237, 1244 (2012) ; State v. Acker , 133 Hawai‘i 253, 266-67, 327 P.3d 931, 944-45 (2014). Indeed, here the DPA and the circuit court referenced this doctrine multiple times at a pretrial hearing and the circuit court ruled in reliance on the doctrine. That is to say, defense counsel had no reason to believe that the circuit court ... ...
-
State v. Gallagher
... ... See, e.g. , State v. Acker , 133 Hawai‘i 253, 277, 327 P.3d 931, 955 (2014) (stating that prior incidents where defendants also robbed lone men, left them at remote locations, and escaped in their victims' vehicles were admissible to show common plan and lack of coercion); State v. Austin , 70 Haw. 300, 307, 769 P.2d ... ...
Get Started for Free
