State v. Aguirre, 052820 AZAPP2, 2 CA-CR 2019-0157
|Docket Nº:||2 CA-CR 2019-0157|
|Opinion Judge:||ECKERSTROM, JUDGE|
|Party Name:||The State of Arizona, Appellee, v. Timothy Michael Aguirre, Appellant.|
|Attorney:||James Fullin, Pima County Legal Defender By Jeffrey Kautenburger, Assistant Legal Defender, Tucson Counsel for Appellant|
|Judge Panel:||Judge Eckerstrom authored the decision of the Court, in which Presiding Judge Eppich and Judge Espinosa concurred.|
|Case Date:||May 28, 2020|
|Court:||Court of Appeals of Arizona|
Not for Publication - Rule 111(c), Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court in Pima County No. CR20183927001 The Honorable John Hinderaker, Judge
James Fullin, Pima County Legal Defender By Jeffrey Kautenburger, Assistant Legal Defender, Tucson Counsel for Appellant
Judge Eckerstrom authored the decision of the Court, in which Presiding Judge Eppich and Judge Espinosa concurred.
¶1 After a jury trial, appellant Timothy Aguirre was convicted of aggravated driving with an illegal drug or its metabolite while his license was suspended and revoked. The trial court sentenced him to an enhanced, minimum prison term of eight years. Counsel has filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Clark, 196 Ariz. 530 (App. 1999), stating he has reviewed the record and "has found no tenable issue to raise on appeal." Counsel has asked us to search the record for fundamental error. Aguirre has not filed a supplemental brief.
¶2 Viewed in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, see State v. Delgado, 232 Ariz. 182, ¶ 2 (App. 2013), the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's finding of guilt, see A.R.S. §§ 13-3401(6)(c)(xxxviii)...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP