State v. Allen

Docket Number76/10
Decision Date28 October 2011

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • State v. Hewins
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 6 d3 Agosto d3 2014
    ...process principles “assure an accused a jury trial on all issues relating to each element of a given criminal charge”); State v. Allen, 423 Md. 208, 31 A.3d 476 (2011) (holding prosecution's use of offensive collateral estoppel to establish an essential element of a charged offense in a cri......
  • State v. Huffine
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • 17 d2 Julho d2 2018
    ...crime beyond a reasonable doubt thereby diminishing state’s burden of proof and invading province of the jury); Maryland v. Allen , 423 Md. 208, 31 A.3d 476, 483-88 (2011) (noting that "overwhelming majority of federal and state courts that have addressed the question have held that collate......
  • State v. Davis
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • 27 d3 Agosto d3 2014
    ...constitution prohibits use of issue preclusion to establish an essential element of a charge in a criminal case); State v. Allen, 423 Md. 208, 226, 31 A.3d 476, 488 (2011) (agreeing with other courts that “the offensive use of collateral estoppel against the defendant deprives the defendant......
  • People v. Morrison
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 30 d4 Novembro d4 2017
    ...of collateral estoppel is rarely, if ever, permitted is consistent with decisions of other states' high courts (see State v. Allen, 423 Md. 208, 210, 31 A.3d 476, 476 [2011] ; People v. Goss, 446 Mich. 587, 590–591, 596–600, 521 N.W.2d 312, 312, 315–317 [1994] ; State v. Johnson, 134 N.H. 4......
  • Get Started for Free