State v. Ammons, s. 51550-6

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Washington
Writing for the CourtDOLLIVER
Citation718 P.2d 796,105 Wn.2d 175
PartiesThe STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Roy Lee AMMONS, et al., Appellants.
Docket NumberNos. 51550-6,51580-8 and 51587-5,s. 51550-6
Decision Date13 May 1986

Page 175

105 Wn.2d 175
718 P.2d 796
The STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Roy Lee AMMONS, et al., Appellants.
Nos. 51550-6, 51580-8 and 51587-5.
Supreme Court of Washington.
May 13, 1986.
ORDER
CHANGING OPINION

Page 191

DOLLIVER, Chief Justice.

It is hereby ordered that the opinion in the above cause, as the same appears at 105 Wash.2d 175, 713 P.2d 719, be changed as follows:

1. That portion of the first incomplete paragraph on page 189, 713 P.2d on page 727 beginning with the word "Garrett" in the third line from the top of page 189, 713 P.2d page 727 and ending with the word "relief" in the eighteenth line from the top of page 189, 713 P.2d page 727 is deleted, and the following sentences are inserted in its place:

Garrett argued that the guilty plea form failed to show that he was aware of his right to remain silent, failed to set forth the elements of the crime of burglary, failed to set forth the consequences of pleading guilty and failed to include a sufficient factual basis for the plea. A determination as to the validity of these issues cannot be made from the face of the guilty plea form. Garrett must pursue the usual channels for relief.

2. The two sentences beginning with the word "Similar" in the eighteenth line from the bottom of page 189, 713 P.2d page 727 and ending with the word "courts," in the fifteenth line from the bottom of page 189, 713 P.2d page 727 are deleted, and the following sentences are inserted in their place:

The plea on its face does not show the constitutional safeguards were not provided. Similar to Garrett, Barton's recourse is to the appellate courts.

[718 P.2d 797] 3. The sentence beginning with the word "Ammons" in the sixth line from the bottom of page 189, 713 P.2d page 727 is deleted, and the following sentence is inserted in its place: "The validity of that claim cannot be determined facially."

To continue reading

Request your trial
384 practice notes
  • State v. Post, 57846-0
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Washington
    • March 12, 1992
    ...prior criminal but unconvicted behavior to influence the sentencing decision. State v. Ammons, 105 Wash.2d 175, 184, 713 P.2d 719, 718 P.2d 796, cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930, 107 S.Ct. 398, 93 L.Ed.2d 351 (1986). It is no less important that constitutional guaranties be observed at the senten......
  • State v. Derri, 80396-4-I
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Washington
    • May 10, 2021
    ...court for sentencing and the person named in the prior conviction are the same person." State v. Ammons, 105 Wn.2d 175, 190, 713 P.2d 719, 718 P.2d 796 (1986). "[T]he identity of names is sufficient proof, which may be rebutted by the defendant's declaration under oath that he is not the sa......
  • State v. Floyd, s. 42396–1–II, 43021–5–II.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Washington
    • December 17, 2013
    ...however, on a conviction “constitutionally invalid on its face” to increase the punishment. State v. Ammons, 105 Wash.2d 175, 187–88, 718 P.2d 796 (1986). ¶ 42 In both Ammons, 105 Wash.2d at 189, 718 P.2d 796, and Bembry, 46 Wash.App. at 291, 730 P.2d 115, the “face” of the conviction inclu......
  • State v. Ellison, 33215-2-III
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Washington
    • June 14, 2016
    ...except on constitutionally valid convictions, is also a constitutional right. In State v. Ammons, 105 Wn.2d 175, 713 P.2d 719, 718 P.2d 796 (1986), defendants challenged the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981, chapter 9.94A RCW (SRA) on various constitutional grounds. They argued that, under the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
384 cases
  • State v. Post, 57846-0
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Washington
    • March 12, 1992
    ...prior criminal but unconvicted behavior to influence the sentencing decision. State v. Ammons, 105 Wash.2d 175, 184, 713 P.2d 719, 718 P.2d 796, cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930, 107 S.Ct. 398, 93 L.Ed.2d 351 (1986). It is no less important that constitutional guaranties be observed at the senten......
  • State v. Derri, 80396-4-I
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Washington
    • May 10, 2021
    ...court for sentencing and the person named in the prior conviction are the same person." State v. Ammons, 105 Wn.2d 175, 190, 713 P.2d 719, 718 P.2d 796 (1986). "[T]he identity of names is sufficient proof, which may be rebutted by the defendant's declaration under oath that he is not the sa......
  • State v. Floyd, s. 42396–1–II, 43021–5–II.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Washington
    • December 17, 2013
    ...however, on a conviction “constitutionally invalid on its face” to increase the punishment. State v. Ammons, 105 Wash.2d 175, 187–88, 718 P.2d 796 (1986). ¶ 42 In both Ammons, 105 Wash.2d at 189, 718 P.2d 796, and Bembry, 46 Wash.App. at 291, 730 P.2d 115, the “face” of the conviction inclu......
  • State v. Ellison, 33215-2-III
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Washington
    • June 14, 2016
    ...except on constitutionally valid convictions, is also a constitutional right. In State v. Ammons, 105 Wn.2d 175, 713 P.2d 719, 718 P.2d 796 (1986), defendants challenged the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981, chapter 9.94A RCW (SRA) on various constitutional grounds. They argued that, under the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT