State v. Arlene's Flowers, Inc., NO. 91615-2
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Washington |
| Writing for the Court | GORDON McCLOUD, J. |
| Citation | 187 Wash.2d 804,389 P.3d 543 |
| Parties | STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. ARLENE'S FLOWERS, INC., d/b/a Arlene's Flowers and Gifts, and Barronelle Stutzman, Appellants. Robert Ingersoll and Curt Freed, Respondents, v. Arlene's Flowers, Inc., d/b/a Arlene's Flowers and Gifts, and Barronelle Stutzman, Appellants. |
| Docket Number | NO. 91615-2 |
| Decision Date | 16 February 2017 |
187 Wash.2d 804
389 P.3d 543
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
ARLENE'S FLOWERS, INC., d/b/a Arlene's Flowers and Gifts, and Barronelle Stutzman, Appellants.
Robert Ingersoll and Curt Freed, Respondents,
v.
Arlene's Flowers, Inc., d/b/a Arlene's Flowers and Gifts, and Barronelle Stutzman, Appellants.
NO. 91615-2
Supreme Court of Washington.
Filed February 16, 2017
Kristen Kellie Waggoner, Jeremy D. Tedesco, Alliance Defending Freedom, 15100 N 90th St., Scottsdale, AZ, 85260, George M. Ahrend, Ahrend Law Firm PLLC, 100 E Broadway Ave., Moses Lake, WA, 98837-1740, Counsel for Appellants.
Michael Ramsey Scott, Amit D. Ranade, Michael Jacob Ewart, Hillis Clark Martin & Peterson PS, 999 3rd Ave. Ste. 4600, Seattle, WA, 98104-4084, Margaret Chen, ACLU of Washington, 901 5th Ave. Ste. 630, Seattle, WA, 98164-2086, Elizabeth Olmsted Gill, ACLU Foundation, 39 Drumm Street, San Francisco, CA, 94111, Todd Richard Bowers, Attorney General-CJD, 800 5th Ave. Ste. 2000, Seattle, WA, 98104-3188, Kimberlee L. Gunning, Columbia Legal Services, 101 Yesler Way Ste. 300, Seattle, WA, 98104-2528, Noah Guzzo Purcell, Alan D. Copsey, Rebecca R. Glasgow, Attorney General's Office, PO Box 40100, Olympia, WA, 98504-0100, Counsel for Respondents.
Floyd Edwin Ivey, Ivey Law Offices, 7233 W Deschutes Ave. Ste. C, Kennewick, WA,
99336-6707, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Protecting Constitutional Freedoms, Inc.
Jeffrey Paul Helsdon, Oldfield & Helsdon PLLC, PO Box 64189, Tacoma, WA, 98464-0189, Ilya Shapiro, Jayme Weber, Cato Institute, 1000 Mass. Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20001, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Cato Institute.
Michael Alexander Patterson, Patterson Buchanan Fobes Leitch PS, 2112 3rd Ave. Ste. 500, Seattle, WA, 98121-2391, Mark Rienzi, Adele Keim, Diana Verm, Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, 1200 New Hampshire Avenue NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC, 20036, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Becket Fund for Religious Liberty.
David Morgan Steven Dewhirst, Attorney at Law, PO Box 552, Olympia, WA, 98507-0552, Stephanie Diane Olson, Attorney at Law, 19112 NE 168th St., Woodinville, WA, 98072-9104, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of International Christian Photographers.
Karolyn Ann Hicks, Stokes Lawrence PS, 1420 5th Ave. Ste. 3000, Seattle, WA, 98101-2393, Shannon Minter, Christopher Stoll, National Center for Lesbian Rights, 870 Market Street, Suite 370, San Francisco, CA, 94102, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of National Center for Lesbian Rights, Legal Voice, National Lesbian Gay Bisexual & Transgender Bar Association.
Daniel Jeffrey Shih, Lindsey Godfrey Eccles, Susman Godfrey L.L.P., 1201 3rd Ave. Ste. 3800, Seattle, WA, 98101-3087, Jennifer C. Pizer, Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, 4221 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 280, Los Angeles, CA, 90010-3512, Amicus Curiae on behalf of Lambda Lega Defense, Education Fund, Inc.
Jessica L. Ellsworth, Laura A. Szarmach, Kaitlyn Golden, Hogan Lovells US LLP, 555 13th Street NW, Washington, DC, 20004, Nicole E. Schiavo, Hogan Lovells US LLP, 875 Third Avenue, New York, NY, 10022, Steven M. Freeman, Seth M. Marnin, Michelle N. Deutchman, Anti-Defamation League, 605 Third Avenue, New York, NY, 10158, Christian Emile Mammen, Hogan Lovells US LLP, 3 Embarcadero Ctr. Fl. 15, San Francisco, CA, 94111-4038, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Anti-defamation League and Twenty-six Other Organizations.
Sherrilyn Ifill, Janai Nelson, Christina Swarns, Coty Montag, NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, 40 Rector Street, 5th Floor, New York, NY, 10006, Charles Christian Sipos, David A. Perez, Perkins Coie LLP, 1201 3rd Ave. Ste. 4900, Seattle, WA, 98101-3099, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Naacp Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
Hank L. Balson, Public Interest Law Group, PLLC, 705 2nd Ave. Ste. 1000, Seattle, WA, 98104-1758, Richard B. Katskee, Carmen N. Green, American United, 1901 L Street NW Suite 400, Washington, DC, 20036, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
Thomas S. Olmstead, Attorney at Law, PO Box 68, Poulsbo, WA, 98370-0068, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of So. Baptist Convention.
Mark John Holady, Attorney at Law, 4800 SW Griffith Dr. Ste. 320, Beaverton, OR, 97005-8716, Thomas C. Berg, University of St. Thomas School of Law, Msl 400, 1000 Lasalle Avenue, Minneapolis, MN, 55403, Kimberlee Wood Colby, Christian Legal Society, 8001 Braddock Road Suite 302, Springfield, VA, 22151, Douglas Laycock, University of Virginia Law School, 580 Massie Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Christian Legal Society, Association of Christian Schools Internal, National Association of Evangelicals.
Bryan Patrick Harnetiaux, Attorney at Law, 517 E 17th Ave., Spokane, WA, 99203-2210, Valerie Davis Mcomie, Attorney at Law, 4549 Nw Aspen St., Camas, WA, 98607-8302, Kelby Dahmer Fletcher, Stokes Lawrence, 1420 5th Ave. Ste. 3000, Seattle, WA, 98101-2393, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Washington State Association for Justice Foundation.
Leonard J. Feldman, Peterson Wampold Rosato Feldman Luna, 1501 4th Ave. Ste. 2800, Seattle, WA, 98101-3677, Jamila Asha Johnson, Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt PC, 1420 5th Ave. Ste. 3400, Seattle, WA, 98101-
4010, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Washington Businesses.
Mark Goldfeder, Anton Sorkin, Restoring Religious Freedom Project, Gambrell Hall, Suite 310, 1301 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, James Abernathy, Attorney at Law, PO Box 552, Olympia, WA, 98507-0552, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Law and Religion Practitioners.
Jesse Andrew Wing, MacDonald Hoague & Bayless, 705 2nd Ave. Ste. 1500, Seattle, WA, 98104-1745, Jeffrey Lowell Needle, Maynard Building, 119 1st Ave. S Ste. 200, Seattle, WA, 98104-3450, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Washington Employment Lawyers Association.
Seth Leslie Cooper, Newton Kight LLP, PO Box 79, Everett, WA, 98206-0079, John C. Eastman, Anthony T. Caso, Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, C/o Chapman University, One University Drive, Orange, CA, 92886, Amicus Curiae on behalf of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence.
Rebecca A. Zotti, Sedgwick, LLP, 600 University St. Ste. 2915, Seattle, WA, 98101, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Professor Tobias B. Wolff.
Bryce Patrick McPartland, McPartland Law Offices, PO Box 1055, Moses Lake, WA, 98837-0160, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Twelve States and the Governor of Kansas.
Daniel J. Appel, Foreman Appel Hotchkiss & Zimmerman PLLC, 124 N Wenatchee Ave., Wenatchee, WA, 98801-2239, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Legal Scholars.
Keith Allen Kemper, Ellis Li & McKinstry PLLC, 2025 1st Ave Ph A, Seattle, WA, 98121-3125, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Frederick Douglass Foundation, National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, National Black Church Initiative, Coalition of African American Pastors USA, National Black Religious Broadcasters, Alveda King Ministries, Radiance Foundation, Mount Calvary Christian Center, Church of God in Christ, Hosanna Asamblea De Dios, New Hope International Church, Ryan T. Anderson.
Marshall Casey, M Casey Law, PLLC, 1106 N Washington St. Ste. B, Spokane, WA, 99201-2205, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Adam J. Macleod.
Blythe H. Chandler, Beth Ellen Terrell, Terrell Marshall Law Group PLLC, 936 N 34th St. Ste. 300, Seattle, WA, 98103-8869, Isaac Ruiz, Benjamin Blystad Gould, Keller Rohrback LLP, 1201 3rd Ave. Ste. 3200, Seattle, WA, 98101-3276, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Northwest Consumer Law Center.
GORDON McCLOUD, J.
¶ 1 The State of Washington bars discrimination in "public ... accommodation[s]" on the basis of "sexual orientation." RCW 49.60.215 (Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD)). Barronelle Stutzman owns and operates a place of public accommodation in our state: Arlene's Flowers Inc. Stutzman and her public business, Arlene's Flowers and Gifts, refused to sell wedding flowers to Robert Ingersoll because his betrothed, Curt Freed, is a man. The State and the couple sued, each
alleging violations of the WLAD and the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), ch. 19.86 RCW. Stutzman defended on the grounds that the WLAD and CPA do not apply to her conduct and that, if they do, those statutes violate her state and federal constitutional rights to free speech, free exercise, and free association.
¶ 2 The Benton County Superior Court granted summary judgment to the State and the couple, rejecting all of Stutzman's claims. We granted review and now affirm.
FACTS
¶ 3 In 2004, Ingersoll and Freed began a committed, romantic relationship. In 2012, our state legislature passed Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 6239, which recognized equal civil marriage rights for same-sex couples. LAWS OF 2012, ch. 3, § 1. Freed proposed marriage to Ingersoll that same year. The two intended to marry on their ninth anniversary, in September 2013, and were "excited about organizing [their] wedding." Clerk's Papers (CP) at 350. Their plans included inviting "[a] hundred plus" guests to celebrate with them at Bella Fiori Gardens, complete with a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Brush & Nib Studio, LC v. City of Phx., No. CV-18-0176-PR
...connected with permitting access to the buildings and open fields on their farm. Id. at 431–32.¶118 State v. Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. , 187 Wash.2d 804, 389 P.3d 543 (2017), vacated and remanded , Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. Washington , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S. Ct. 2671, 201 L.Ed.2d 1067 (2018) (......
-
State v. Arlene's Flowers, Inc., NO. 91615-2
..."sincerely held religious beliefs" and "analyze[d] each of [her] constitutional defenses carefully." State v. Arlene’s Flowers, Inc., 187 Wash.2d 804, 815-16, 830, 389 P.3d 543 (2017). And on remand, we have painstakingly reviewed the record for any sign of intolerance on behalf of this cou......
-
Brush & Nib Studio, LC v. City of Phx., No. CV-18-0176-PR
...connected with permitting access to the buildings and open fields on their farm. Id. at 431-32.¶118 State v. Arlene's Flowers, Inc., 389 P.3d 543 (Wash. 2017), vacated and remanded, Arlene's Flowers, Inc. v. Washington, 138 S. Ct. 2671 (2018) (mem.)1, and Klein, 410 P.3d 1051, are distingui......
-
Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. R.G. &. G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc., No. 16-2424
...prohibitions on discrimination with regard to housing, employment, medical care, and education. See State v. Arlene's Flowers, Inc. , 187 Wash.2d 804, 389 P.3d 543, 565–66 (2017) (collecting cases), petition for cert. filed Arlene's Flowers, Inc. v. Washington , 86 U.S.L.W. 3047(July14017))......
-
Brush & Nib Studio, LC v. City of Phx., No. CV-18-0176-PR
...connected with permitting access to the buildings and open fields on their farm. Id. at 431–32.¶118 State v. Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. , 187 Wash.2d 804, 389 P.3d 543 (2017), vacated and remanded , Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. Washington , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S. Ct. 2671, 201 L.Ed.2d 1067 (2018) (......
-
State v. Arlene's Flowers, Inc., NO. 91615-2
..."sincerely held religious beliefs" and "analyze[d] each of [her] constitutional defenses carefully." State v. Arlene’s Flowers, Inc., 187 Wash.2d 804, 815-16, 830, 389 P.3d 543 (2017). And on remand, we have painstakingly reviewed the record for any sign of intolerance on behalf of this cou......
-
Brush & Nib Studio, LC v. City of Phx., No. CV-18-0176-PR
...connected with permitting access to the buildings and open fields on their farm. Id. at 431-32.¶118 State v. Arlene's Flowers, Inc., 389 P.3d 543 (Wash. 2017), vacated and remanded, Arlene's Flowers, Inc. v. Washington, 138 S. Ct. 2671 (2018) (mem.)1, and Klein, 410 P.3d 1051, are distingui......
-
Klein v. Or. Bureau of Labor & Indus., A159899
...have declined to draw a "status/ conduct" distinction similar to that urged by the Kleins. See, e.g. , State v. Arlene's Flowers, Inc. , 187 Wash. 2d 804, 823, 389 P.3d 543, 552 (2017) (stating that "numerous courts—including our own—have rejected this kind of status/conduct distinction in ......
-
Third-Class Citizens: Unequal Protection Within United States Territories.
...(99.) Cf. Brief for Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., and Others as Amici Curiae, State v. Arlene's Flowers, Inc., 389 P.3d 543 (Wash. 2016) (No. 91615-2), 2016 WL 3552843, at *2 (arguing religious liberty ends where infringement on other protected rights (100.) See Maureen Joh......
-
Religious Exemptions
...in favor of the city favorably cited language from Masterpiece Cakeshop’s majority opinion that 160. State v. Arlene’s Flowers, Inc., 389 P.3d 543, 548 (Wash. 2017), vacated sub nom Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. Washington, 138 S. Ct. 2671 (2018). 161. Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. Washington, 138 ......