State v. Arreola

Decision Date13 December 2012
Docket NumberA144001,NOS. S060640,S. S060640
Citation353 Or. 103,295 P.3d 50
PartiesState v. Jose Luis Arreola
CourtOregon Supreme Court
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

250 Or.App. 496, 281 P.3d 634. Linder and Landau JJ., would allow.

DENIED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • State v. Cuevas
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • 21 Mayo 2014
    ...court's ruling denying a motion for mistrial for abuse of discretion. State v. Arreola, 250 Or.App. 496, 500, 281 P.3d 634, rev. den.,353 Or. 103, 295 P.3d 50 (2012). Denial of a mistrial motion will be deemed error only “when a defendant's ability to obtain a fair trial has been impaired.”......
  • State v. Garrett
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • 18 Julio 2018
    ... ... 864posture to the court. See State v. Arreola , 250 Or. App. 496, 501-03, 281 P.3d 634, rev. den. , 353 Or. 103, 295 P.3d 50 (2012) (defendant was denied a fair trial because the case presented an overwhelming probability that the jury failed to follow instructions). We review for legal error whether a supplemental instruction3 resulted in ... ...
  • State v. Wyant, A162127
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • 16 Octubre 2019
    ... ... We review a trial courts denial of a motion for mistrial for abuse of discretion. State v. Arreola , 250 Or. App. 496, 500, 281 P.3d 634, rev. den. , 353 Or. 103, 295 P.3d 50 (2012). On appeal, defendant contends that "the volume and emotional intensity of the disputed statements posed an obstacle to fairness that the court could not overcome with a jury instruction," and that, therefore, the ... ...
  • Sjomeling v. Lasser
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 13 Diciembre 2012

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT