State v. Arthur
| Decision Date | 21 July 2011 |
| Citation | State v. Arthur, 302 Conn. 910, 23 A.3d 1249 (Conn. 2011) |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE of Connecticutv.Johnnie ARTHUR. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HEREAuden Grogins, special public defender, in support of the petition.Rocco A. Chiarenza, deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 128 Conn.App. 371, 18 A.3d 610, is denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
5 cases
-
State v. Rodriguez
...admissible.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Arthur, 128 Conn.App. 371, 383, 18 A.3d 610, cert. denied, 302 Conn. 910, 23 A.3d 1249 (2011). “In State v. Whelan ... we reviewed our continued adherence to the traditional rule prohibiting the use as substantive evidence of a prior......
-
Arthur v. Comm'r of Corr.
...in affirming the petitioner's conviction on direct appeal, State v. Arthur, 128 Conn. App. 371, 18 A.3d 610, cert. denied, 302 Conn. 910, 23 A.3d 1249 (2011), stated that the jury could have reasonably found the following facts. "On the evening of September 29, 2007, the victim, Andrew Garn......
-
Arthur v. Comm'r of Corr.
...in affirming the petitioner's conviction on direct appeal, State v. Arthur, 128 Conn.App. 371, 18 A.3d 610, cert. denied, 302 Conn. 910, 23 A.3d 1249 (2011), stated that the jury could have reasonably found the following facts. "On the evening of September 29, 2007, the victim, Andrew Garne......
-
State v. Rodriguez
...admissible.'' (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Arthur, 128 Conn. App. 371, 383, 18 A.3d 610, cert. denied, 302 Conn. 910, 23 A.3d 1249 (2011). ''In State v. Whelan . . . we reviewed our continued adherence to the traditional rule prohibiting the use as substantive evidence of a ......
Get Started for Free