State v. Ash, 14929
Decision Date | 20 December 1994 |
Docket Number | No. 14929,14929 |
Citation | 231 Conn. 484,651 A.2d 247 |
Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
Parties | STATE of Connecticut v. Eric ASH. |
Lauren Weisfeld, Asst. Public Defender, with whom, on the brief, was Ramona S. Carlow, Special Public Defender, for appellant (defendant).
John A. East III, Deputy Asst. State's Atty., with whom, on the brief, were James E. Thomas, State's Atty., and Herbert E. Carlson, Jr., Sr. Asst. State's Atty., for appellee (State).
Before PETERS, C.J., and CALLAHAN, BORDEN, BERDON and KATZ, JJ.
The issue before the court is whether in the criminal trial of the defendant, Eric Ash, the trial court's misstatement of law on the duty to retreat under the self-defense statute, General Statutes § 53a-19, 1 was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-55(a)(1). 2 The defendant appealed that conviction to the Appellate Court, claiming that the trial court's jury instructions had contained misstatements about the duty to retreat and that these misstatements, in light of the charge as a whole, made it reasonably possible that the jury was misled. State v. Ash, 33 Conn.App. 782, 794, 638 A.2d 633 (1994). The Appellate Court agreed with the defendant's contention that the trial court's instructions had contained misstatements about the duty to retreat, but it agreed with the state that the error was harmless and affirmed the judgment of conviction. Id. We granted certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court, solely to review whether the Appellate Court properly had concluded that the trial court's misstatements were harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Ash, 229 Conn. 916, 642 A.2d 1211 (1994). 3 We reverse the judgment of the Appellate Court.
The Appellate Court determined that the jury reasonably could have found the following facts. "On April 3, 1991, at approximately 8:30 p.m., Vincent Ellison was stabbed to death at the doorway to his apartment. The victim's apartment is located on the first floor of a dilapidated, brick building at 500 Ann Street in Hartford. The front entrance to the building opens into a large hallway on the first floor and there are two apartments located on the left side of the hallway that are visible from the front entrance. The victim's apartment was the first one on the left and James Osborne's was the second. Beyond Osborne's apartment is a short corridor leading to another apartment, not visible from the front entrance. The victim's cousin, Oscar Steve Anglin, lived in the third apartment.
State v. Ash, supra, 33 Conn.App. at 784-87, 638 A.2d 633.
The defendant provided a somewhat different and more detailed version of the events immediately surrounding the stabbing. On the basis of his testimony, the jury could reasonably have found these following facts. The defendant did not have a knife when he left Anglin's apartment. It was the victim who, after the defendant disarmed him of his stick, first reached into his jeans and pulled out a knife. The victim then came at the defendant with the knife but slipped and dropped it. The defendant dove on the victim and started to hit him with his bare hands. During the continued melee, the victim tried to retrieve the knife. The defendant struggled to get the knife out of the victim's reach and managed to gain possession of it. As the defendant tried to get up and throw the knife out of the way, the victim continued to kick and hit the defendant in the face. With the knife in his hand, the defendant tried to block the victim's assaults. It was during that part of the struggle that the defendant stabbed the victim.
In instructing the jury regarding self-defense and the duty to retreat, the trial court stated, inter alia, "[a] person is not justified in using deadly physical force upon another person if he knows that he can avoid the necessity of using such force, with complete safety by retreating. These are statements taken directly from the statute for your guidance.... As to retreating with complete safety, you must consider what was reasonable for the defendant to perceive was available as retreat or if none was available without the use of physical force, what degree of physical force was reasonably necessary to make one available. Now, in this connection, you can realize what you are doing is attempting to stand in the shoes of the defendant, as you would perceive a reasonable person to view the same situation, under the same conditions.
The jury thereafter convicted the defendant of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Osimanti, No. 18311.
...as improper." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Ebron, 292 Conn. 656, 685, 975 A.2d 17 (2009); see also State v. Ash, 231 Conn. 484, 493-94, 651 A.2d 247 (1994) ("[a] charge to the jury is not to be critically dissected for the purpose of discovering possible inaccuracies of stat......
-
State v. Montanez, No. 17087.
...instruction on a defense, like an improper instruction on an element of an offense, is of constitutional dimension." State v. Ash, 231 Conn. 484, 493, 651 A.2d 247 (1994); see also State v. Fuller, 199 Conn. 273, 278, 506 A.2d 556 (1986) ("A fundamental element of due process is the right o......
-
State v. Rios, AC 36987
...claimed error did not warrant reversal), cert. denied, 323 Conn. 938, 151 A.3d 386 (2016).Our Supreme Court held in State v. Ash , 231 Conn. 484, 492, 651 A.2d 247 (1994), that General Statutes § 53a–19 (b), which governs the duty to retreat, requires the finder of fact, in deciding whether......
-
State v. McColl
...right, we conclude that the defendant's claim satisfies the first two prongs of Golding and is reviewable. See State v. Ash, 231 Conn. 484, 493, 651 A.2d 247 (1994). We will, therefore, consider whether the alleged constitutional violation clearly exists and, if so, whether it denied the de......
-
Significant Developments in Criminal Law 1994-1995
...(collecting cases). 90. State v. Brown, 235 Conn. at 506 n.5. 91. 233 Conn. 44, 658 A.2d 947 (1995). 92. Id. at 80. 93. Id. at 85-86. 94. 231 Conn. 484, 651 A.2d 247 (1995). 95. Id. at 496-497. 96. Nystagmus is -[a]n abnormal and involuntary movement of the eyeballs from side to side or up ......