State v. Atti

Decision Date23 April 1942
Citation128 N.J.L. 318,25 A.2d 634
Docket Number1
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. RAPHAEL ATTI, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

Appeal from Supreme Court.

Benjamin J. Darling, of Jersey City (John H. Jobes, of Jersey City, of counsel), for plaintiff-inerror.

William A. Hegarty, Prosecutor of the Pleas, of Morristown, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Brogan, 127 N.J.L. 39, 21 A.2d 603.

Since the assignment was abandoned in the Supreme Court, there is no occasion to consider whether in the circumstances there was error in overruling questions propounded to the accused as to the taking of "legal advice" respecting his right to vote; and the point is therefore reserved.

For affirmance: The CHANCELLOR, Justices BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PORTER, and COLIE, Judges DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, and THOMPSON—11.

...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • State v. De Meo
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 14 Noviembre 1955
    ...Pruser, 127 N.J.L. 97, 101, 21 A.2d 641 (Sup.Ct.1941); State v. Atti, 127 N.J.L. 39, 44, 21 A.2d 603 (Sup.Ct.1941) affirmed 128 N.J.L. 318, 25 A.2d 634 (E. & A.1942). Cf. Hall, Principles of Criminal Law 323 et seq. In Commonwealth v. Mash, supra, the defendant remarried several years after......
  • Mallon, Matter of
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • 19 Abril 1989
    ...v. Benny, 20 N.J. 238, 252-255, 119 A.2d 155 (1955); State v. Atti, 127 N.J.L. 39, 41-42, 21 A.2d 603 (Sup.Ct.1941), aff'd 128 N.J.L. 318, 25 A.2d 634 (E. & A. 1942). Compare N.J.S.A. 19:4-1. In In re Petition of Hartnett, 163 N.J.Super. 257, 394 A.2d 871 (App.Div.1978), we And where a pers......
  • Haack v. Ranieri
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • 20 Abril 1964
    ...and to which, if absent, he intends to return.' State v. Atti, 127 N.J.L. 39, 41--42, 21 A.2d 603 (Sup.Ct.1941), affirmed 128 N.J.L. 318, 25 A.2d 634 (E. & A. 1942). See also State v. Benny, 20 N.J. 238, 119 A.2d 155 The court in In re McCarthy, 18 N.J.Misc. 5, 10 A.2d 142 (Cir.Ct.1939), de......
  • State v. Benny
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 19 Diciembre 1955
    ...Cadwalader v. Howell, 18 N.J.L. 138 (Sup.Ct.1840); State v. Atti, 127 N.J.L. 39, 21 A.2d 603 (Sup.Ct.1941) affirmed 128 N.J.L. 318, 25 A.2d 634 (E. & A.1942); State v. Pruser, 127 N.J.L. 97, 21 A.2d 641 (Sup.Ct.1941). But they urge that these cases are not controlling because none of them g......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT