State v. Atti
| Decision Date | 23 April 1942 |
| Citation | State v. Atti, 128 N.J.L. 318, 25 A2d 634 (N.J. 1942) |
| Docket Number | 1 |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. RAPHAEL ATTI, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR |
Appeal from Supreme Court.
Benjamin J. Darling, of Jersey City (John H. Jobes, of Jersey City, of counsel), for plaintiff-inerror.
William A. Hegarty, Prosecutor of the Pleas, of Morristown, for the State.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Brogan, 127 N.J.L. 39, 21 A.2d 603.
Since the assignment was abandoned in the Supreme Court, there is no occasion to consider whether in the circumstances there was error in overruling questions propounded to the accused as to the taking of "legal advice" respecting his right to vote; and the point is therefore reserved.
For affirmance: The CHANCELLOR, Justices BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PORTER, and COLIE, Judges DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, and THOMPSON—11.
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
State v. De Meo
...Pruser, 127 N.J.L. 97, 101, 21 A.2d 641 (Sup.Ct.1941); State v. Atti, 127 N.J.L. 39, 44, 21 A.2d 603 (Sup.Ct.1941) affirmed 128 N.J.L. 318, 25 A.2d 634 (E. & A.1942). Cf. Hall, Principles of Criminal Law 323 et seq. In Commonwealth v. Mash, supra, the defendant remarried several years after......
-
Mallon, Matter of
...v. Benny, 20 N.J. 238, 252-255, 119 A.2d 155 (1955); State v. Atti, 127 N.J.L. 39, 41-42, 21 A.2d 603 (Sup.Ct.1941), aff'd 128 N.J.L. 318, 25 A.2d 634 (E. & A. 1942). Compare N.J.S.A. 19:4-1. In In re Petition of Hartnett, 163 N.J.Super. 257, 394 A.2d 871 (App.Div.1978), we And where a pers......
-
Haack v. Ranieri
...and to which, if absent, he intends to return.' State v. Atti, 127 N.J.L. 39, 41--42, 21 A.2d 603 (Sup.Ct.1941), affirmed 128 N.J.L. 318, 25 A.2d 634 (E. & A. 1942). See also State v. Benny, 20 N.J. 238, 119 A.2d 155 The court in In re McCarthy, 18 N.J.Misc. 5, 10 A.2d 142 (Cir.Ct.1939), de......
-
State v. Benny
...Cadwalader v. Howell, 18 N.J.L. 138 (Sup.Ct.1840); State v. Atti, 127 N.J.L. 39, 21 A.2d 603 (Sup.Ct.1941) affirmed 128 N.J.L. 318, 25 A.2d 634 (E. & A.1942); State v. Pruser, 127 N.J.L. 97, 21 A.2d 641 (Sup.Ct.1941). But they urge that these cases are not controlling because none of them g......