State v. Auld

Docket NumberSCWC-13-0002894
Decision Date24 November 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
26 cases
  • Flubacher v. State
    • United States
    • Hawaii Supreme Court
    • March 21, 2018
    ...522, 538, 193 P.3d 438, 454 (App. 2008) (citing Butler, 528 F.3d at 635-36 ), overruled on other grounds by State v. Auld, 136 Hawai'i 244, 254, 361 P.3d 471, 481 (2015).Finally, while the Teague retroactivity analysis does not apply to the Majority's decision to reverse Flubacher's extende......
  • State v. Tetu
    • United States
    • Hawaii Supreme Court
    • December 5, 2016
    ...constitutional law are reviewed under the right/wrong standard. Phua, 135 Hawai'i at 512, 353 P.3d at 1054 ; accordState v. Auld, 136 Hawai'i 244, 250, 361 P.3d 471, 477 (2015). III. DISCUSSION A. Motion to Compel Discovery1. Right to Access the Crime Scene Under HRPP Rule 16 The issue of w......
  • State v. Loher
    • United States
    • Hawaii Supreme Court
    • July 20, 2017
    ...(count two). Loher v. State , 118 Hawai‘i 522, 524, 193 P.3d 438, 440 (App. 2008), overruled on other grounds by State v. Auld , 136 Hawai‘i 244, 361 P.3d 471 (2015). The State filed a "Memorandum of Pretrial" on December 9, 1999, stating that the trial was expected to take five to six days......
  • Hawaiiusa Fed. Credit Union v. Monalim
    • United States
    • Hawaii Supreme Court
    • April 30, 2020
    ...State by Office of Consumer Prot. v. Joshua, 141 Hawai‘i 91, 98-99, 405 P.3d 527, 534-35 (2017) (same); State v. Auld, 136 Hawai‘i 244, 255-56, 361 P.3d 471, 482-83 (2015) (same); In re T.M., 131 Hawai‘i 419, 319 P.3d 338 (2014) (same); State v. Hussein, 122 Hawai‘i 495, 229 P.3d 313 (2010)......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Case Notes
    • United States
    • Hawaii State Bar Association Hawai’i Bar Journal No. 24-09, September 2020
    • Invalid date
    ...require a jury to find that Means qualified as a repeat offender beyond a reasonable doubt as required by State v. Auld, 136 Hawaii 244, 361 P3d 471 (2015). In Auld, it was held "that a jury is required to find that the defendant's prior conviction(s) have been proved beyond a reasonable do......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT