State v. Basurto, 64444

Citation249 Kan. 584,821 P.2d 327
Decision Date06 December 1991
Docket NumberNo. 64444,64444
PartiesSTATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Miguel A. BASURTO, Appellant.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Kansas
MEMORANDUM OPINION

HERD, Justice:

After careful consideration of this case we adopt and affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals at 15 Kan.App.2d 264, 807 P.2d 162 (1991).

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • State v. Fisher, 89,300.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Kansas
    • March 16, 2007
    ...against unreasonable searches and seizures has been extended. See State v. Basurto, 15 Kan.App.2d 264, 266, 807 P.2d 162, aff'd 249 Kan. 584, 821 P.2d 327 (1991) (citing United States v. Dunn, 480 U.S. 294, 300, 107 S.Ct. 1134, 94 L.Ed.2d 326, reh. denied 481 U.S. 1024, 107 S.Ct. 1913, 95 L......
  • Walls v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • March 28, 2008
    ...of defendant will authorize the search of any vehicles or buildings within the `curtilage' of that residence"), aff'd, 249 Kan. 584, 821 P.2d 327 (1991); State v. Brouillette, 465 So.2d 124, 126 (La.Ct.App. 4th Cir.1985) ("A warrant authorizing the search of the `premises' must reasonably b......
  • State v. Patterson
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Kansas
    • April 22, 2016
    ...describes a single unit of ownership—i.e., the whole of the property.In State v. Basurto, 15 Kan.App.2d 264, 807 P.2d 162, aff'd 249 Kan. 584, 821 P.2d 327 (1991), a Court of Appeals case this court adopted and affirmed, the court was confronted with a warrant that did not include the term ......
  • U.S. v. Gorman
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • December 30, 1996
    ...v. Georgia, 262 Ga. 728, 425 S.E.2d 856, 857-58 (1993); Kansas v. Basurto, 15 Kan.App.2d 264, 807 P.2d 162, 163-65; aff'd, 249 Kan. 584, 821 P.2d 327 (1991); North Carolina v. Trapper, 48 N.C.App. 481, 269 S.E.2d 684 (1980). Accordingly, even if we had decided that the curtilage was not par......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT