State v. Batchelor, 54201

Decision Date13 October 1970
Docket NumberNo. 54201,54201
PartiesSTATE of Iowa, Appellee, v. Benjamin Eugene BATCHELOR, Appellant.
CourtIowa Supreme Court

Alanson K. Elgar, Mount Pleasant, for appellant.

Richard C. Turner, Atty. Gen., and Max A. Gors, Asst. Atty. Gen., and James L. Morrison, County Atty., Mount Pleasant, for appellee.

UHLENHOPP, Justice.

The question in this appeal is whether the minutes of testimony attached to a county attorney's information are to be considered in ruling on a demurrer to the information.

On December 5, 1969, this information was filed:

'Comes now James L. Morrison as County Attorney of Henry County, State of Iowa, and in the name and by the authority of the State of Iowa, accuses Benjamin Eugene Batchelor of the crime of larceny of a motor vehicle committed as follows:

'The said Benjamin Eugene Batchelor on or about the 23rd day of November, A.D. 1969, in the County of Henry and State of Iowa, did take, steal and carry away a motor vehicle belonging to New London Farmers Co-op., New London, Iowa, contrary to Section 321.82, 1966 Code of Iowa as amended.'

The names and minutes of testimony of two witnesses were attached to the information: the manager of the cooperative in question, who would testify that the cooperative's truck was parked near the cooperative's place of business and was subsequently missing although no one had authority to take it; and a police officer, who would testify that he stopped the truck with Robert Roy Lynch driving the vehicle and defendant riding in it, but, while he was occupied with another motorist, the truck was quickly turned down a side street and abandoned.

Defendant demurred to the information on the ground the minutes did not support the allegation in the information that defendant 'did take, steal and carry away a motor vehicle'. The trial court overruled the demurrer.

Notwithstanding the ruling on the demurrer, the county attorney gave notice of additional testimony. He added as a witness the superintendent of the Iowa Mental Health Institute at Mount Pleasant, who would testify that defendant and Lynch were patients in the Institute on November 23, 1969, and escaped that day. The county attorney also amended the testimony of the police officer, who would testify in addition that defendant told him defendant and Lynch worked for the cooperative in question and were on their way to Peoria, Illinois, to pick up parts.

With the minutes of testimony thus enlarged, defendant pled guilty to the charge. A report before the trial court at the time disclosed that defendant is not psychotic. He had been in the Mental Health Institute for examination and report in connection with a criminal charge in another county. Defendant's plea to the present charge was accepted and he was sentenced. He now appeals.

Defendant's sole contention on appeal is...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • State v. White
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • October 15, 1975
    ...attempt to buttress his demurrer by reference to minutes attached to the information was a futile gesture. See State v. Batchelor, 180 N.W.2d 457, 458--459 (Iowa 1970). No error attended the overruling of defendant's II. As a prefare to further consideration of this case it is to be underst......
  • State v. Aldrich, 57150
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • July 31, 1975
    ...have been by motion for bill of particulars (§ 773.6) followed by a motion to set aside the information (§ 773.7). State v. Batchelor, 180 N.W.2d 457, 459 (Iowa 1970). Moreover, it is generally impermissible for a trial court to take judicial notice of proceedings in a related but wholly di......
  • State v. Kobrock, 55785
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • December 19, 1973
    ...State v. Finnegan, 244 Iowa 166, 172, 55 N.W.2d 223, 226; State v. Salter, 162 N.W.2d 427, 431 (Iowa 1968); State v. Batchelor, 180 N.W.2d 457, 458--459 (Iowa 1970) and authorities cited in these Examination of the record discloses that the present information on its face charged defendant ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT