State v. Becker
| Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
| Citation | State v. Becker, 12 Or. 318, 7 P. 329 (Or. 1885) |
| Decision Date | 08 June 1885 |
| Parties | STATE v. BECKER. |
Appeal from Multnomah county
Alfred F. Sears, for appellant.
John M. Gearin, Dist. Atty., for respondent.
The appellant was convicted of the crime of arson. A motion was made for a new trial, on the ground that one of the jurors had drank intoxicating liquors during the trial, and also on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. The motion was denied, hence this appeal. The questions raised are not the subject of an appeal, as has just been shown in the case of Kearney v. Snodgrass, ante, 309, and the authorities there cited.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
6 cases
-
State v. Evans
... ... State, 1 Or. 271; State v. Fitzhugh, 2 Or. 227, 236; State v. Wilson, 6 Or. 429; Hallock v. Portland, 8 Or. 29, 30; State v. McDonald, 8 Or. 114, 118; State v. Becker, 12 Or. 318, 319, 7 P. 329; Kearney v. Snodgrass, 12 Or. 311, 7 P. 309; State v. Roberts, 15 Or. 187, 198, 13 P. 896; State v. Clements, 15 Or. 237, 243, 14 P. 410; Beckman v. Hamlin, 23 Or. 313, 319, 31 P. 707; State v. Foot You, 24 Or. 61, 70, 73, 32 P. 1031, 33 P. 537; [98 Or. 238] Elder v ... ...
-
State v. Gardner
... ... Bowen v. State, 1 Or. 271, State v. Fitzhugh, 2 Or. 227; State v. Wilson, 6 Or. 428; State McDonald, 8 Or. 113: State v. Drake, 11 Or. 396, 4 P. 1204; State v. Becker, 12 Or. 318, 7 P. 329; State v. Mackey, 12 Or. 154, 6 P. 648; State v. Roberts, 15 Or. 187, 13 P. 896; State v. Clements, 15 Or. 237, 14 P. 410; State v. Foot You, 24 Or. 61, 32 P. 1031, and 33 P. 537. Assuming, however, that error can be predicated upon the refusal of the court to set aside the ... ...
-
State v. Foot You
... ... State v. Fitzhugh, 2 Or. 227; State v. Wilson, 6 Or. 429; State v. McDonald, 8 Or. 113; State v. Drake, 11 Or. 396, 4 P. 1204; State v. Mackey, 12 Or. 154, 6 P. 648; State v. Becker, 12 Or. 318, 7 P. 329; State v. Clements, 15 Or. 237, 14 P. 410; Hallock v. Portland, 8 Or. 29; Kearney v. Snodgrass, 12 Or. 311, 7 P. 309. In State v. Mackey, supra, which was an appeal from a conviction of murder in the first degree, Lord, J., says: "The bill of exceptions purports to contain, in ... ...
-
State v. Sing
...State v. Fitzhugh, 2 Or 227; State v. Wilson, 6 Or. 429; State v. McDonald, 8 Or. 113; State v. Drake, 11 Or. 396. 4 P. 1204; State v Becker, 12 Or. 318, 7 P. 329; State Clements, 15 Or. 237, 14 P. 410; Hallock v. Portland, 8 Or. 29; Kearney v. Snodgrass, 12 Or. 311, 7 P. 309." State v. Foo......
Get Started for Free
