State v. Becker
| Decision Date | 02 August 1921 |
| Docket Number | No. 22961.,22961. |
| Citation | State v. Becker, 233 S.W. 641, 289 Mo. 660 (Mo. 1921) |
| Parties | STATE ex rel. POLLOCK v. BECKER, Secretary of State. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
56 cases
-
Todd v. Hull
... ... attempt by injunction to try title to public office, which may be tried only in quo warranto proceedings instituted in the Supreme Court of the State, on the information of the attorney general, pursuant to 3 Comp.Laws 1929, 15296. The case was brought on for hearing in the trial court, duly ... The observation of Mr. Justice Graves in the case of State ex rel. Pollock v. Becker, 289 Mo. 660, 233 S.W. 641, 646, is pertinent: Of these bills, which change in a way the system of justices' courts in Jackson county and cut down ... ...
-
Idaho State AFL-CIO v. Leroy
... ... The Missouri Supreme Court held that the Courts must be free to review such declarations, and this Court should do the same ... One year later the Missouri Supreme Court again reaffirmed its rejection of Kadderly in State ex rel. Pollock v. Becker, 289 Mo. 660, 233 S.W. 641 (1921). As Justice Graves pointed out in his concurring opinion, "The Kadderly Case, 48 Or. 118, 74 P. 710, 75 P. 222, from Oregon, does not announce sound doctrine." 233 S.W. at 646. Missouri has consistently held to such opinion and has reviewed emergency ... ...
-
Midwest Inst. of Health, PLLC v. Governor of Mich. (In re Certified Questions from the U.S. Dist. Court)
... ... BEFORE THE ENTIRE BENCH Markman, J. 958 N.W.2d 6 506 Mich. 337 This case concerns the nature and scope of our state's public response to one of the most threatening public-health crises of modern times. In response to a global, national, and state outbreak of the ... " Id. at 228, 234 N.W. 581, quoting Pollock v. Becker , 289 Mo. 660, 233 S.W. 641, 649 (1921) (en banc). This definition of "public safety" matches others from both that period and now. 6 Our adoption ... ...
-
Mich. United Conservation Clubs v. Secretary of State
... ... See Young v. Ann Arbor, 267 Mich. 241, 243, 255 N.W. 579 (1934). However, "[c]ourts are not supposed to be blinded bats." Todd v. Hull, 288 Mich. 521, 543, 285 N.W. 46 (1939) (opinion of Bushnell, J.), quoting State ex rel Pollock v. Becker, 289 Mo. 660, 684, 233 S.W. 641, 646 (1921). 64 Hence, I would not be so quick to eliminate categorically the possibility that this Court may consider, where pertinent, relevant, and ascertainable, the Legislature's motives in enacting a statute ... IV. Referendum v Initiative ... ...
Get Started for Free