State v. Berberick
Decision Date | 06 March 1909 |
Citation | 100 P. 209,38 Mont. 423 |
Parties | STATE v. BERBERICK. |
Court | Montana Supreme Court |
Appeal from District Court, Deer Lodge County; Geo. B. Winston Judge.
John Berberick was convicted of murder, and appeals from the judgment and an order denying a new trial. Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Peter Matson, John H. Tolan, and W. B. Rodgers, for appellant.
Albert J. Galen, Atty. Gen., and W. H. Poorman, Asst. Atty. Gen for the State.
The state of Montana accused the above-named defendant and one Frank Carpenter of the crime of murder. Separate trials were demanded, and this defendant was convicted of murder in the second degree. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and also from an order denying him a new trial.
At the time of the commission of the alleged offense Berberick was about 18 and Carpenter 15 years of age. On January 14, 1907 the dead body of John Johnson was found near the manure pile at the ranch of George Parrott, about seven miles east of the city of Anaconda. Tracks were found in the snow about the place, and several witnesses testified to having seen Berberick and Carpenter going in the direction of the ranch in the morning and returning in the afternoon. Johnson was an employé of Parrott's and was alone at the ranch on the day in question; Parrott having gone to Anaconda the day before. The weather was extremely cold. Between 2 and 3 o'clock on the afternoon of the 14th the discovery was made that the door of the ranchhouse had been broken open, and an iron safe had been wrecked, apparently with some high explosive. Pieces of giant powder were found. Parrott had no giant powder. Hanging upon a nail in the wall, and covered by a man's cap, was a revolver belonging to Parrott. When he left home on the 13th this revolver contained five cartridges. When he returned on the afternoon of the 14th it contained but one. The autopsy of the body of Johnson disclosed four bullet wounds, and the examining surgeon testified that he died from hemorrhage due to the wounds.
William A. Taylor, the undersheriff of Deer Lodge county, testified for the state that on the 16th of January the defendant, who was then in custody in the county jail, received a copy of the Butte-Intermountain newspaper from Isabel Fleming, the sheriff's daughter, who gave it to him at Taylor's request.
Thomas Stewart, the deputy county attorney of Deer Lodge county, testified: That on the evening of the 16th, in the sheriff's office at the jail, in the presence of Taylor, the undersheriff, Mr. Allen, the coroner, Mr. Cole, a reporter for the Anaconda Standard newspaper, and Messrs. Edward Beal and A. N. Strom, Mr. James, the county attorney, asked the defendant if he had sent for him, and received the reply that he had. That Mr. James then told the defendant that, "if his purpose was to make a confession or statement, he would state his rights to him before he should make any statement whatever"; that he (the defendant)
Stewart's testimony was, more or less, corroborated by Strom, Beal Cole, Allen, James, and Taylor. Strom also testified: Beal and Allen testified that they did not remember and did not believe that Mr. James made such statements. Mr. Cole testified: Mr. Allen, the coroner, testified that on the morning of the 15th he was present with the jailor when the county attorney questioned Berberick at the jail; and Taylor testified that when James came out of the jail he brought out a statement that he had taken down, and stated "that he had not been able yet to get the boys to confess, or words to that effect." Taylor also testified that the confession of Carpenter was obtained on the morning of the 16th, and that he told Berberick that Carpenter had confessed. He said: Mr. James testified: That he had an interview with Berberick at the jail on the morning of the 16th in presence of the coroner and the jailor; that he advised the defendant of his rights and privileges at that time, told him that any statement he made must be voluntary, without fear or inducement, and would be used against him; that Berberick made a statement at that time which Mr. James reduced to writing; that he was then advised that he "did not have to sign it unless he wanted to"; that he hesitated a moment and then declined to sign it. The county attorney testified, also, that during this morning...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Heaston
... ... instruction, No. 1; but where the matter is covered by a ... given instruction, in this case by Instruction No. 41, it is ... not error to refuse defendant's request. State v ... Mahoney, 24 Mont. 281, 61 P. 647; State v ... Berberick, 38 Mont. 423, 100 P. 209, 16 Ann.Cas. 1077; ... State v. Huffman, 89 Mont. 194, 296 P.2d 789; ... State v. Dotson, 26 Mont. 305, 67 P. 938 ... The ... theory of justifiable homicide was explained to the jury in ... Instruction No. 37 and others, and it was made clear to the ... ...