State v. Bernard

Decision Date23 December 1980
Docket NumberNo. 66551,66551
Citation391 So.2d 1180
PartiesSTATE of Louisiana v. Albert BERNARD.
CourtLouisiana Supreme Court

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Connick, Dist. Atty., Fred Harper, J. Bassett, Louise S. Korns, Lance Africk, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-appellee.

Orleans Indigent Defender Program, Thomas Ford, Clyde Merritt, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Albert Bernard was charged by bill of information with simple burglary, a violation of La.R.S. 14:62. On January 24, 1979, he was tried before a six person jury and convicted by a vote of five to one. Thereafter, defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender under the provisions of La.R.S. 15:529.1 to serve six years at hard labor. On appeal he urges six assignments of error, one of which relates to the less than unanimous verdict.

Supplemental Assignment of Error No. 4

By this assignment defendant contends that the 5-1 verdict returned in this case was unlawful.

In Burch v. Louisiana, 441 U.S. 130, 99 S.Ct. 1623, 60 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979), the Supreme Court concluded that conviction by only five members of a six-member jury raised such doubts as to the jury's representation of the true sense of the community as to violate the Sixth Amendment guarantee of trial by jury. In Brown v. Louisiana, --- U.S. ----, 100 S.Ct. 2214, 65 L.Ed.2d 159 (1980), the Court determined that the rule of Burch was fundamental to the integrity of the fact-finding process, and thus required retroactive application, at least to cases still pending on direct review. (See, Powell, J., concurring opinion).

Accordingly, defendant's conviction and sentence are reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Love v. Johns-Manville Canada, Inc.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • May 29, 1985
    ......808, 83 L.Ed.2d 800 (1985) (" Coons II "), the New Jersey Supreme Court reversed its earlier position, and held "as a matter of state law that Coons I is to be applied prospectively only from the date of that decision, August 3, 1983." Id. at 422, 476 A.2d at 765 (emphasis ...Bernard, 391 So.2d 1180, 1181 (La.1980) (in Brown v. Louisiana, 447 U.S. 323, 100 S.Ct. 2214, U.S. Supreme Court ordered retroactive application of ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT