State v. Bernhardt
Decision Date | 08 October 1931 |
Docket Number | 5712 |
Citation | 51 Idaho 134,3 P.2d 537 |
Parties | STATE, Respondent, v. J. B. BERNTHARDT, Appellant |
Court | Idaho Supreme Court |
CRIMINAL LAW-ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO COMMIT RAPE-EVIDENCE.
1. Assault with intent to commit rape on female under age of consent is committed by perpetrator wilfully and feloniously laying hands on female with design to carnally know her.
2. Intent is essence of crime of assault with intent to commit rape.
3. Intent, which is essential to support conviction of assault with intent to commit rape, cannot be presumed, but must be shown to exist by competent evidence and beyond reasonable doubt.
4. Evidence held insufficient to support conviction of assault with intent to commit rape.
APPEAL from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, for Bannock County. Hon. Jay L. Downing, Judge.
Appeal from judgment of conviction of the crime of assault with intent to commit rape. Reversed and remanded.
Reversed.
Peterson & Clark, for Appellant.
The corroboration required of a prosecutrix in cases of rape or assault with intent to commit rape must be evidence which does not emanate from the mouth of the injured female; it must not rest wholly upon her credibility but it must be such evidence as adds to, strengthens, confirms and corroborates her and tends to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense. (Henderson v. State, 85 Neb. 444, 123 N.W. 459, 26 L. R. A., N. S., 1149; State v Stowell, 60 Iowa 535, 15 N.W. 417; State v Carpenter 124 Iowa 5, 98 N.W. 775; State v Egbert, 125 Iowa 443, 101 N.W. 191; State v. Stewart, 52 Wash. 61, 17 Ann. Cas. 411, 100 P. 153; People v. Page, 162 N.Y. 272, 56 N.E. 750; State v. Parker, 134 N.C. 209, 46 S.E. 511; Mares v. Territory, 10 N.M. 770, 65 P. 165.)
Fred J. Babcock, Attorney General, and Z. Reed Millar, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.
The corroboration may be made by incriminating circumstances, and need not be by direct evidence of the particular fact constituting the crime. Whether there is any corroborative evidence tending to connect defendant with the crime is a question for the court. Whether or not the prosecutrix is clearly corroborated by other facts and circumstances is a question for the jury and the verdict will not be disturbed unless not clearly corroborated. (State v. Vail, 47 Idaho 354, 275 P. 578; State v. Mason, 41 Idaho 506, 239 P. 733.)
Appellant was convicted of the crime of assault with intent to commit rape and was sentenced to serve a term at hard labor of from one to fourteen years in the state penitentiary. He has appealed from the judgment of conviction and from an order denying motion for new trial.
The material facts are substantially as follows: Appellant, a man 64 years of age, owned a house in Pocatello which he rented to the mother of prosecutrix, Manda Brewster, who on August 18, 1929, with her five children, were occupying the same. On this date, about 10 A. M., Manda Brewster left the home and remained away until late in the afternoon. About 3 o'clock in the afternoon of said day appellant went to the home of Manda Brewster and found the prosecutrix, 11 years old, and her brother, 13 years old, in one of the sleeping rooms playing a phonograph. The other children were outside of the house. Appellant, as he testified he was frequently in the habit of doing, laid down on the bed. At his request, the oldest boy went to the Keystone Farm, about eight or ten blocks away, to get a jug of water from a well and was gone between twenty and thirty minutes. Prosecutrix testified as follows:
When appellant tried to get his hands up her bloomer legs prosecutrix told him to stop and he stopped. Prosecutrix testified further with reference to a coat-hanger and sofa pillow, which were shown by the evidence to have been used by the prosecutrix for the purpose of teasing or annoying appellant and the use of which was continued after the alleged assault, as follows:
It appears that after the foregoing events took place the prosecutrix went to the home of Mrs. Henderson, a neighbor who, as disclosed by the record, was, to say the least, extremely unfriendly to appellant. The prosecutrix made complaint to Mrs. Henderson, which evidence was admitted without objection, that the appellant had been after her again trying to get his hands up her bloomer legs. Mrs. Henderson testified that the prosecutrix was very excited and crying and could hardly talk when she arrived at the witness' home. The police were immediately notified by Mrs. Henderson, who, upon their arrival, informed them what the prosecutrix had told her. When the prosecutrix's mother returned home the prosecutrix made a complaint to her, and that evening the mother of prosecutrix went to the police station and prosecutrix made a complaint to a police officer. Appellant was a frequent visitor at the Brewster home. He ate his meals there whenever he did not have time to go uptown. He owned part of the furniture and ran in and out of the house at all times. It was the habit of appellant to romp and play with prosecutrix as well as other children in the immediate...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Kotthoff, 7311
... ... his purpose. The fact that defendant asked prosecutrix to ... kiss him and thereupon attempted to do so is no evidence that ... he intended to use such force upon her as might be necessary ... to rape her. State v. Neil, 13 Idaho 539, 90 P. 860, ... 91 P. 318; State v. Bernhardt, 51 Idaho 134, 139, 3 ... P.2d 537; People v. Dowell, 136 Mich. 306, 99 N.W ... 23, 24. If such were the law, there would doubtless be ... thousands of instances where prosecutions might be made ... Indeed, ... the prosecutrix said she opened the door "to the ... bathroom about ... ...
-
State v. Gailey
...and that the assault was made with the requisite, specific intent. State v. Andreason, 44 Idaho 396, 257 P. 370; State v. Bernhardt, 51 Idaho 134, 3 P.2d 537. specific intent inherent in the crime of assault with intent to commit rape cannot be inferred from the action of a defendant where ......
-
Matter of Gorden
... ... 8th Cir.1926), the court, considering whether a bankrupt was entitled to exempt crops growing on the homestead under the state homestead exemption statute, explained, "there is some conflict in the different jurisdictions as to whether such crops, while unsevered, are ... ...
- Standlee v. Hawley