State v. Berry, No. 72786

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Missouri
Writing for the CourtROBERTSON; BLACKMAR, C.J., and RENDLEN, HIGGINS, COVINGTON and HOLSTEIN, JJ., and MORGAN; BILLINGS
Citation801 S.W.2d 64
PartiesSTATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Melissa BERRY, Defendant-Respondent. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jimmy BERRY, Defendant-Respondent.
Decision Date13 December 1990
Docket NumberNo. 72786

Page 64

801 S.W.2d 64
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Melissa BERRY, Defendant-Respondent.
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jimmy BERRY, Defendant-Respondent.
No. 72786.
Supreme Court of Missouri,
En Banc.
Dec. 13, 1990.

H. Morley Swingle, Pros. Atty., Cape Girardeau, for plaintiff-appellant.

Jack L. Duncan, Flat River, for defendants-respondents.

ROBERTSON, Judge.

An anonymous caller informed Deputy Don Perry of the Cape Girardeau sheriff's office of a quantity of marijuana at the home of Melissa and Jimmy Berry. The tip described with particularity the outside of the Berry home and indicated personal knowledge of the existence of the marijuana in the Berry home. The issue in this case is whether the informant's tip, together with Deputy Perry's subsequent corroboration of the accuracy of the informant's description of the Berry home, constitutes sufficient probable cause for a neutral magistrate to issue a search warrant, and for the admission of evidence recovered pursuant to that warrant under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We hold that a neutral magistrate could find probable cause under these circumstances and that the trial court erred in

Page 65

suppressing the evidence. Reversed and remanded with directions.

I.

Melissa Berry and Jimmy Berry were separately charged with felony possession of more than 35 grams of marijuana in April, 1989. The charges stem from the seizure of marijuana found in their home during the execution of a search warrant. Defendants filed separate motions to suppress the evidence on the grounds that the affidavit supporting the search warrant did not state sufficient probable cause to support the issuance of the search warrant.

On August 21, 1989, prior to trial, the trial court held a suppression hearing. Deputy Perry testified that he had received a telephone call from a female caller who provided the initial information on which the search warrant in this case was issued. The caller's information and Deputy Perry's subsequent investigation formed the basis of Deputy Perry's search warrant affidavit, which stated in pertinent part:

2. On Wednesday, April 26, 1989, at approximately 4:10 p.m., I received a telephone call from a person who wished to remain anonymous. The call concerned a quantity of processed marihuana that was seen by the caller the day before on Tuesday, April 25, 1989.

3. The location of the processed marihuana was in a mobile home possessed by Jimmy and Missy Berry. The caller stated that the mobile home was a single-wide trailer, tan in color. The mobile home is located at the intersection of Highway D and County Road 463 in Cape Girardeau County. The anonymous caller said that there was a small deck in front of the trailer with a small above-ground swimming pool on the deck. The caller described the pool as resembling a metal livestock water trough. The person on the telephone also described a vehicle that was parked in front of the trailer as a late model two-tone GMC or Chevrolet pickup truck. In order to verify the above information relayed to me by the caller, I drove by the trailer and photographed it. I have attached the photograph, which is marked as Exhibit A, to this affidavit and it is incorporated herein by reference. The description of the residence as stated by the caller is correct.

4. The caller stated that he/she had visited the trailer on Wednesday, April 26th. The caller had seen four or five large freezer bags containing a green leafy substance which the caller believed to be marihuana. The anonymous caller told me that he/she had seen marihuana before on other occasions. The caller stated that the processed marihuana was last seen in the master bedroom of the mobile home. The caller advised that Missy Berry was transferring the marihuana from the large freezer bags into smaller plastic baggies.

The trial court 1 initially overruled the motion, finding that while the affidavit failed to show probable cause, the law enforcement officers had acted in good faith reliance on the warrant. The Berrys were tried in a consolidated trial, and on September 12, 1989, a jury found both defendants guilty.

On November 20, 1989, the trial court reconsidered its ruling on defendants' motions to suppress in response to the defendants' motions for a new trial. The court again found that there was insufficient probable cause to justify issuance of the search warrant and further found the affidavit "so lacking in indicia of probable cause" that the officers' reliance on the search warrant was unreasonable and sustained the motions for a new trial. The prosecution appealed the suppression of the evidence in both cases under Section 547.200, RSMo 1986. The two appeals were consolidated and the Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, reversed the rulings and remanded to the trial court. This Court granted defendants' application

Page 66

for transfer. We have jurisdiction. Mo. Const. art. V, § 10.

II.

The Fourth Amendment guarantees that "no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." A firm definition of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
31 practice notes
  • State v. Brown, No. WD 73142.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • 20 November 2012
    ...initial judicial determination of probable cause made by the issuing judge at the time of the issuance of the warrant. State v. Berry, 801 S.W.2d 64, 66 (Mo. banc 1990). We reverse only if that determination was clearly erroneous. Id.;State v. Hawkins, 760 S.W.2d 926, 927 (Mo.App.1988). “Th......
  • U.S. v. Foree, No. 91-5020
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
    • 9 February 1995
    ...service in his name at that location, and where external observation of the house otherwise revealed nothing unusual); State v. Berry, 801 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Mo.1990) (following Jackson; probable cause found where first-hand tip was corroborated by police solely to the extent of verifying locat......
  • State v. Williams
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • 16 November 1999
    ...erroneous. State v. Milliorn, 794 S.W.2d 181, 183 (Mo. banc 1990); State v. Hawkins, 760 S.W.2d 926, 927 (Mo.App.1988). State v. Berry, 801 S.W.2d 64, 66 (Mo. banc Evidence is suppressed pursuant to the "exclusionary rule," which is based on the Fourth Amendment. Willis v. State, 630 S.W.2d......
  • State v. Dowell
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • 22 August 2000
    ...1996). "While the meaning of probable cause is a legal issue, its existence in a particular case is a question of fact." State v. Berry, 801 S.W.2d 64, 66 (Mo. banc 1990). Thus, appellate review of whether the issuance of a search warrant lacked the requisite probable cause to render the su......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
31 cases
  • State v. Brown, No. WD 73142.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • 20 November 2012
    ...initial judicial determination of probable cause made by the issuing judge at the time of the issuance of the warrant. State v. Berry, 801 S.W.2d 64, 66 (Mo. banc 1990). We reverse only if that determination was clearly erroneous. Id.;State v. Hawkins, 760 S.W.2d 926, 927 (Mo.App.1988). “Th......
  • U.S. v. Foree, No. 91-5020
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
    • 9 February 1995
    ...service in his name at that location, and where external observation of the house otherwise revealed nothing unusual); State v. Berry, 801 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Mo.1990) (following Jackson; probable cause found where first-hand tip was corroborated by police solely to the extent of verifying locat......
  • State v. Williams
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • 16 November 1999
    ...erroneous. State v. Milliorn, 794 S.W.2d 181, 183 (Mo. banc 1990); State v. Hawkins, 760 S.W.2d 926, 927 (Mo.App.1988). State v. Berry, 801 S.W.2d 64, 66 (Mo. banc Evidence is suppressed pursuant to the "exclusionary rule," which is based on the Fourth Amendment. Willis v. State, 630 S.W.2d......
  • State v. Dowell
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • 22 August 2000
    ...1996). "While the meaning of probable cause is a legal issue, its existence in a particular case is a question of fact." State v. Berry, 801 S.W.2d 64, 66 (Mo. banc 1990). Thus, appellate review of whether the issuance of a search warrant lacked the requisite probable cause to render the su......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT