State v. Blatt
| Docket Number | 14-0757 |
| Decision Date | 16 June 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Kiyak v. Connecticut Department of Agriculture, HHBCV186042188S
... ... provided the plaintiff with the opportunity to take Jack out ... of state. After the restraint order was issued, some area ... residents expressed concern about their safety, and Fairfield ... Animal Control ... prerequisite to the separate consideration of whether a dog ... should be destroyed." State v. Blatt, 235 W.Va ... 489, 497, 774 S.E.2d 570 (2015). Similarly, the plaintiff’s ... reliance on Mansour v. King County, 131 Wash.App ... ...
-
Monica Newman v. City of Payette, an Idaho Mun. Corp.
...Cir. 2001) (state must generally provide pre-deprivation process unless pre-deprivation procedures are impracticable); State v. Blatt, 774 S.E. 2d 570, 578 (W. Va. 2015) (finding statute required court determination that the dog was dangerous, vicious, or in the habit of attacking persons b......
-
City of Huntington v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corp.
... ... MILANO KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge: The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, exercising the privilege afforded by the State of West Virginia through the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, West Virginia Code 51-1A-1 through 51-1A-13, requests that the Supreme ... State v ... Blatt , 235 W.Va. 489, 774 S.E.2d 570, 579 (2015) (quoting Burless v ... W ... Va ... Hosps ., Inc ., 215 W.Va. 765, 601 S.E.2d 85, 94 n.9 (2004)). With ... ...
-
State v. Humane Soc'y of Raleigh Cnty., Inc.
... ... We review challenges to findings of fact under a clearly erroneous standard; conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.' Syl. pt. 4, Burgess v. Porterfield, 196 W.Va. 178, 469 S.E.2d 114 (1996)." Syl. Pt. 1, State v. Blatt, 235 W. Va. 489, 774 S.E.2d 570, 571 (2015).We explained in syllabus point 5 of Findley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 213 W.Va. 80, 576 S.E.2d 807 (2002):Standing is comprised of three elements: First, the party attempting to establish standing must have suffered an ... ...
Get Started for Free