State v. Blazier

Decision Date05 March 1900
CitationState v. Blazier, 36 Or. 97, 60 P. 203 (Or. 1900)
PartiesSTATE v. BLAZIER.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Multnomah county; T.A. Stephens, Judge.

John E. Blazier, convicted of crime, appeals.Appeal dismissed.

D.R.N. Blackburn, Atty. Gen., for the motion.

PER CURIAM.

This is a motion by the state to dismiss the appeal because the notice thereof has not been served upon the clerk of the court where the judgment roll was filed, as required by section 1433, Hill's Ann.Laws Or.The case comes within the decision in State v. Horner(Or.)59 P. 549, recently decided, and the motion will therefore be allowed.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • State v. Archerd
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • July 18, 1933
    ...138 Or. 20, 3 P.2d 783, 4 P.2d 628. In State v. Horner, supra, the notice of appeal was not addressed to the county clerk, but in State v. Blazier, supra, it was addressed to the state of Oregon, district attorney, and the county clerk. In each and all of the cases above referred to the not......
  • State v. Berger
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • March 10, 1908
    ... ... State v. Ellis, 3 Or. 497; State v. Bovee, 11 Or. 57, 4 P. 520. The appeal must therefore be dismissed for want of compliance with the requirements of law. State v. Horner, 36 Or. 68, 59 P. 549; State v. Blazier, 36 Or. 97, 60 P ... ...
  • State v. Berg
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • October 13, 1931
    ... ... Section 13-1210 provides that if the appeal be taken by the defendant a similar notice must be served on the district attorney. In State v. Horner, 36 Or. 68, 59 P. 549, State v. Blazier, 36 Or. 97, 60 P. 203, and State v. Berger, 51 Or. 166, 94 P. 181, each being a criminal case, and appeals being matters of purely statutory regulation, the appeals were dismissed for want of a substantial compliance with the statute. In State v. Mageske, 119 Or. 312, 227 P. 1065, 249 P. 364, the ... ...