State v. Bleichner, A--16

Decision Date06 February 1951
Docket NumberNo. A--16,A--16
Citation11 N.J.Super. 542,78 A.2d 577
PartiesSTATE v. BLEICHNER.
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division

Samuel P. Orlando, Camden, argued the cause for defendant-appellant (John L. Morrissey, Camden, attorney).

Benjamin Asbell, Ast. County Pros., Camden, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mitchell H. Cohen, pros. of Camden county, Camden, attorney).

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McGEEHAN, S.J.A.D.

Lawrence G. Bleichner and William J. Sheehan were jointly indicted, and at the trial in the Camden County Court the defendant Bleichner was convicted and defendant Sheehan was acquitted. Defendant Bleichner appeals from the judgment of conviction.

The indictment charged that Lawrence G. Bleichner and William J. Sheehan 'being the contractors engaged to erect a certain dwelling house, to wit, a bungalow, on Walnut Street, Audubon, New Jersey, for one Edgar A. Heubel, and being entrusted as such contractors with the sum of ($2930.00) two thousand nine hundred and thirty dollars, they, the said Lawrence G. Bleichner and William J. Sheehan, did unlawfully and fraudulently convert the said sum of two thousand nine hundred and thirty dollars ($2930.00) to their own use, with intent to cheat and defraud the said Edgar A. Heubel, contrary to the provisions of R.S. 2:124--16 (N.J.S.A.).'

R.S. 2:124--16, N.J.S.A. provides: 'All moneys received by a contracter from the owner or mortgagee of real estate or any leasehold or other interest therein, while a building is being erected, constructed, completed, altered, repaired or having an addition made thereto, are hereby declared to be trust funds in the hands of such contractor to be applied to the amount of all claims due or to become due and owing from such contractor to all persons furnishing labor or materials to him for the erection, construction or completion of the building or any alteration, repair or addition thereto, and any other reasonable and necessary charge in connection with the carrying on and completion of the work on the building. Any contractor or any officer, director or agent of such contractor who pays or consents to the appropriation of such funds for any other purpose prior to the payment of all claims and charges for the payment of which such funds constitute a trust fund as above provided, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.'

On May 5, 1948, Edgar A. Heubel, the complaining witness, and Margaret, his wife, called at the defendants' place of business in Camden, in answer to an advertisement. There they met the defendant Sheehan, who told them that his partner Bleichner was the 'contractor and builder in this organization' and that he would be in soon. When Bleichner came in, they discussed with him the building of a home. They were shown a scale model of a five-room bungalow and agreed to have such a home built for them on a lot which they owned in Audubon. Defendant Bleichner then produced a printed form of contract headed: 'William J. Sheehan Co., Building Contracting, 333 Market Street, Camden, New Jersey' and filled it out. This contract provided that a standard five-room bungalow would be completed for $6,930, which was to be paid by the Heubels in instalments at specified times. This agreement was signed by the Heubels and by the defendant Bleichner. The Heubels paid $250 to defendant Sheehan, in defendant Bleichner's presence, at the time of the signing of the contract on May 5, 1948; and between May 5, 1948 and September 11, 1948, made additional payments of $2,680 to defendant Bleichner, and receipts for all the payments totaling $2,930, signed by defendant Bleichner, were endorsed on the back of the written agreement of May 5, 1948. The payments made by the Heubels not only met the required instalments under the agreement at the time, but were in excess thereof.

When the agreement was signed, Bleichner informed the Heubels that the house could be built within ten to twelve weeks. When the Heubels complained from time to time about the failure to start the construction, Bleichner gave various excuses. After the last payment by the Heubels in September, 1948, the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • State v. Engels
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • 24 Agosto 1954
    ...v. Schmid, 57 N.J.L. 625, 31 A. 280 (Sup.Ct.1895); State v. Solomon, 97 N.J.L. 252, 117 A. 260 (E. & A. 1922); State v. Bleichner, 11 N.J.Super. 542, 78 A.2d 577 (App.Div.1951); State v. Lombardo, 20 N.J.Super. 317, 90 A.2d 39 (App.Div.1952); State v. Algor, 26 N.J.Super. 527, 98 A.2d 340 (......
  • State v. Barbossa
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • 14 Diciembre 1976
    ...of the construction moneys for another purpose prior to the payment of all proper claims and charges thereon. State v. Bleichner, 11 N.J.Super. 542, 78 A.2d 577 (App.Div.1951). (at 59, 120 A.2d at The court clearly distinguished acceptance and possession of the money from use of the money b......
  • State v. Low
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 28 Marzo 1955
    ...on and completion of the work on the buildings. The difference between the instant indictments and that in State v. Bleichner, 11 N.J.Super. 542, 78 A.2d 577 (App.Div.1951), relied upon by defendants, is that the indictment there failed in any wise to state this constituent element of the A......
  • State v. Lombardo, A--539
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • 24 Junio 1952
    ...v. Schmid, 57 N.J.L. 625, 31 A. 280 (Sup.Ct.1895); State v. Solomon, 97 N.J.L. 252, 117 A. 260 (E. & A.1922); State v. Bleichner, 11 N.J.Super. 542, 78 A.2d 577 (App.Div.1951). The omission of an essential element cannot be supplied by inference or implication. State v. De Vita, 6 N.J.Super......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT