State v. Blocher
Citation | 95 Adv.Sh. 442,499 P.2d 1346,10 Or.App. 357 |
Parties | STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Connie R. BLOCHER, Appellant. |
Decision Date | 06 September 1972 |
Court | Court of Appeals of Oregon |
F. E. Glenn, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
John L. Snyder, Dist. Atty., Dallas, argued the cause and filed the briefs for respondent.
Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LANGTRY and FOLEY, JJ.
Defendant was indicted for the second degree murder of her stepchild, a three-year-old girl, and convicted of voluntary manslaughter. She appeals, alleging that (1) the evidence was insufficient to go to the jury, (2) an instruction and verdict on a lesser included offense was erroneous, and (3) the instruction based on the statute saying that a witness is presumed to tell the truth denied her the presumption of innocence. 1
The child died on September 15, 1971 at a hospital in Salem, Oregon to which she was taken after she evidenced severe illness at her home on the evening of September 10. The cause of death was traumatic injury to the brain. One of the attending physicians testified:
She had been in the exclusive care of defendant immediately preceding the time that her condition became critical. Defendant offered no evidence for the child's condition except innuendoes that the child's father may have caused the injury, or the child may have fallen, and denied physical abuse of the child except for a moderate spanking. Defendant was implicated by the testimony of her husband with physical punishment of the child during the preceding weeks. A neighbor testified in detail about a severe beating which he had witnessed the defendant administer with a wooden paddle to the deceased child and an older brother a few weeks prior to the child's death. The defendant denied any such beating. There were pronounced discrepancies between statements the defendant made after her arrest and what she stated on the witness stand.
(1). The evidence was circumstantial and sufficient to go to the jury. A reasonable inference could be drawn from the state's evidence that defendant had followed a course of cruel and malicious treatment of the child which culminated in her death. Further, defendant's denial of the beating which she was described to have given with a paddle to the children entitled the jury, if it believed that the neighbor's version of what occurred was true, to believe that she had a consciousness of guilt.
State v. Carroll, 251 Or. 197, 201, 444 P.2d 1006 (1968).
(2). Defendant's counsel requested the court not to give instructions on the included offense, voluntary manslaughter. The court did give the instruction and the jury found the defendant guilty thereof. Voluntary manslaughter is an included offense. The evidence about abuse of the child preceding her death was such that the jury could conclude that the defendant bore the child malice. This not only supports the charge of second degree murder, but also voluntary manslaughter, if, as it must have, the jury concluded that the defendant did not intend to kill the child but that she nevertheless bore the child malice and beat her, with death resulting. State v. Bates, 241 Or. 263, 405 P.2d 551 (1965).
The state had requested an instruction on the included offense. The defendant under these circumstances cannot, by her request, prevent the court from giving the instruction.
State v. Wilson, 182 Or. 681, 684--685, 189 P.2d 403, 405 (1948).
(3). Defendant asserts that the instruction based upon ORS 44.370 was error, citing Naughten v. Cupp, No. 71--3065 (9th Cir., filed May 24, 1972). In Naughten, a panel of the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that giving this instruction was reversible error. There, the defendant did not take the stand or...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Com. v. Spear
...to whether the homicide is one of two or more degrees, the court must charge on all such degrees') applied in State v. Blocher, 10 Ore.App. 357, 360--361, 499 P.2d 1346 (1972), to uphold a voluntary manslaughter charge over defendant's objection; People v. Mussenden, 308 N.Y. 558, 563, 127 ......
-
State v. Williams
...State v. Atkins, 14 Or.App. 603, 513 P.2d 1191 (1973); State v. Boucher, 13 Or.App. 339, 509 P.2d 1228 (1973); State v. Blocher, 10 Or.App. 357, 499 P.2d 1346 (1972).2 'Conviction of attempt; conviction of included offense. Upon an indictment or information for any offense the jurors may co......
-
Jones v. State
...that the blow causing death was inflicted by the appellant. See, People v. Barnwell, 60 Mich.App. 291, 230 N.W.2d 400; State v. Blocher, 10 Or.App. 357, 499 P.2d 1346; State v. Parmenter, 74 Wash.2d 343, 444 P.2d 680; and People v. Fuentes, 253 Cal.App.2d 969, 61 Cal.Rptr. Secondly, appella......
-
State v. Watts
...resulting from mutual acts of sodomy, where defendant's guilt was inferred from circumstantial evidence only. Accord State v. Blocher, 10 Or.App. 357, 499 P.2d 1346 (1972), affirming second degree murder of defendant's stepchild, where child was in her exclusive care and discrepancies betwe......