State v. Board of State Prison Com'rs

Decision Date18 July 1908
Citation96 P. 736,37 Mont. 378
PartiesSTATE ex rel. HENDERSON et al. v. BOARD OF STATE PRISON COM'RS et al.
CourtMontana Supreme Court

Mandamus by the state, on the relation of F. A. Henderson and another against the board of state prison commissioners and others to compel defendants to sign and execute a contract with relators for the care of the inmates of the state prison. Writ denied.

John F Davies and E. S. Booth, for plaintiffs.

A. J Galen, Atty. Gen., W. H. Poorman, and F. M. Hall, Asst. Atty Gen., for defendants.

SMITH J.

The facts in this case, as disclosed by the affidavit of the plaintiffs and the answer of the defendants, are substantially as follows: On February 5, 1908, the board of state prison commissioners caused to be published a call for bids for the care, custody, and maintenance of all prisoners confined in the state prison at Deer Lodge for the period of two years, commencing the 18th day of June, 1908, in answer to said call two bids were received, one from Conley & McTague, the contractors in charge of the prison at the time, and one from the above named plaintiffs. The bid of the latter was less in amount per capita than that of Conley & McTague. It is alleged in the answer, and shown by the records of the board, that after considering said bids the following proceedings took place: "The board *** found that, in the event of awarding the contract to the said Henderson & Wyman, it would be necessary for the state to take over certain property in said prison belonging to Conley & McTague, who then had the contract for the care and custody of said prison and the prisoners therein. That the taking over of said property of Conley & McTague was required by law, also by the provisions of a contract signed by said board and said Conley & McTague, dated May 28, 1906, which contract is now and ever since said date has been in full force and effect between the said Conley & McTague and said board; paragraph 4 of said contract being in words and figures as follows, to wit: 'Fourth. It is agreed that the said board of state prison commissioners shall have the right to enter and assume control of the state prison and prison grounds and all other property belonging to the state in charge of the parties of the first part [Conley & McTague], and take charge of all prisoners, whenever they shall deem it necessary and to the best interests of the state by reason of breach of this contract, violation of the law, or otherwise; and the parties of the first part agree, at the termination of this contract, or at any other time the board shall deem it necessary to take charge and control of the prison and the prisoners confined therein, to quietly yield up possession of the said state prison without resistance, and turn over to said board all property belonging to the state as well as all property that may be in their possession in the prison, or upon or about the prison grounds, for the use of the prison or the prisoners therein; provided, however, that for all such property necessary to the proper care of the prisoners and the maintenance of the prison belonging to the parties of the first part, delivered to and retained by said board, the parties of the first part shall receive compensation in accordance with their fair market value at such time. In the event of cancellation of this contract for any reason, the first parties shall be paid in full to the date thereof at the rate herein prescribed.' *** That no appropriation had been made by the Legislature for the purpose of taking over and paying for any of said property owned by said Conley & McTague. That, in the absence of said appropriation by the Legislature, the said board had no funds with which to take over said property of Conley & McTague, and was not in position to acquire said property and to turn it over to the said Henderson & Wyman in the event of accepting their bid and awarding said contract to them. That said property of Conley & McTague, or a large portion thereof, aggregating many thousand dollars in value, was necessary for the proper care, custody, and maintenance of said prison and the prisoners therein. That said board had no inventory of the property in said prison that belonged to the state of Montana, or of the property in said prison that belonged to Conley & McTague, and had no knowledge of the value of the property of Conley & McTague that the board would be required under the law and the contracts with Conley & McTague to take over in order to award the contract to some other person or persons. Whereupon Thomas McTague and the said F. A. Henderson and John S. Wyman were called before the said board and examined under oath as to the property in said prison belonging to Conley & McTague, and as to the financial responsibility of said Henderson & Wyman, and their knowledge of the business and affairs of the said prison and their proposed method of conducting same; and thereupon, and at said examination, the said Henderson & Wyman were fully advised and informed by said board as to the condition of the state's funds, and of the absence of any appropriation by the Legislature for the purpose of taking over property in the state prison belonging to the said Conley & McTague, and also of the fact that the said Conley & McTague owned a large amount of property in said prison that would have to be purchased from them in the event that the contract was awarded to some other bidder. *** That at said examination of Henderson & Wyman they stated to the board that they would be in a position to pay a sum not to exceed $25,000 for the purpose of taking over the property in said prison belonging to Conley & McTague, if the board awarded the contract to them, and in its judgment decided that the said sum of $25,000 was a reasonable amount to pay for such property of Conley & McTague as the board would consider necessary and desirable for the proper care, custody, and maintenance of said prison and prisoners therein." That thereupon the board rejected both bids, and ordered that a new call be published, the bids to be opened May 6, 1908. The new call for bids was accordingly made, and was in substance the same as the first call, with the exception of this paragraph, which was inserted therein: "Any and all information respecting ownership of property at the state prison and necessarily used in connection with the proper conduct of the said institution *** may be obtained by calling on the

clerk of this board at the office of this board." Pursuant to said second call, three bids were received-one from the plaintiffs, wherein they offered to care for the inmates of the prison at 39 cents per capita per day; one from Conley & McTague of 45 cents per capita per day; and one from Joslyn & Potter, of 44 cents per day. In the proposal submitted by the plaintiffs the following paragraphs are found: "We further agree under such rules and regulations as may be prescribed by the board to guarantee the state against any liability which it must legally or necessarily assume in the event of the awarding of the said contract to us the transfer of the control and custody of said prisoners to us. We further agree under the rules and regulations of the state board of prison commissioners to furnish all necessary and desirable equipment or property necessary for the proper conduct of the said institution." Neither of said paragraphs, nor anything in substance like the same, is found in the first bid of the plaintiffs. Upon receiving said bids, the board caused to be entered in its minutes a finding that all of the bids were regular and in accordance with the law and the call, and, after examination and consideration thereof, the board on May 7, 1908, took the following action. "After full and careful consideration and examination of each and all of said bids, it was by the board duly and regularly found and determined that the said bid of Messrs. Wyman & Henderson was and is the lowest and best bid, provided that certain terms and conditions hereinafter stated shall be complied with by said bidders; and therefore the contract was by the board duly and regularly awarded unto said bidders upon the express terms, conditions, and regulations here prescribed, to wit:

"First. Said bidders shall on or before the 2d day of June, 1908, pay into the state treasury of the state of Montana in cash the sum of twenty thousand ($20,000) dollars, with the express understanding and agreement that the board of prison commissioners shall be entitled and authorized to expend the same, or any part or portion thereof in the purchase of such property and personal effects belonging to Messrs. Conley & McTague, the present prison contractors, as the said board shall determine necessary and desirable to be kept and held for the proper conduct and management of the business and affairs of said institution and the proper care of the prisoners therein confined, the board to determine what property shall be purchased and the price to be paid therefor.
"Second. Said bidders must furnish on or before the 2d day of June, 1908, a good and sufficient bond, to be approved by the board, in the sum of thirty thousand ($30,000) dollars, in addition to the bond required by law and the call for bids for the faithful performance of the contract, which additional bond shall be in form such as prescribed by the Attorney General's office, and conditioned that such bidders will, without cost or expense to the state, receive, accept, and pay for such of the property of the present contractors, Messrs. Conley & McTague, as the board may deem necessary or desirable to be used in connection with the conduct of the business and affairs of the said state prison after the said $20,000 cash shall have been exhausted by the
...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT