State v. Boneventure

Decision Date04 September 1979
Docket NumberNo. 64131,64131
Citation374 So.2d 1238
PartiesSTATE of Louisiana v. Charles E. BONEVENTURE and Sharon K. Buchanan.
CourtLouisiana Supreme Court

Lewis O. Unglesby, Baton Rouge, for defendant-relator Sandra buchanan.

Jack M. Dampf, D'Amico & Curet, Baton Rouge, for defendant-relator Charles E. Boneventure.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ossie B. Brown, Dist. Atty., David M. Miller, Kay Kirkpatrick, Asst. Dist. Attys. for plaintiff-respondent.

DENNIS, Justice.

On December 4, 1977 an East Baton Rouge Parish deputy sheriff applied for a warrant to search the defendants' residence for marijuana. In support of his application, the officer submitted the following affidavit, which, in pertinent part, recited:

"(O)n December 4, 1977, affiant was contacted by a confidental (sic) and reliable informant who has been working under the direct supervision of affiant (and other officers and who has provided information to this affiant and to other officers leading to past arrests on narcotics violations and the seizure of substances later documented to be narcotics) contacted affiant and stated that he being said confidental (sic) and reliable informant had occasion to be present at 7164 Meadowpark on or about December 2, 1977 and observed a quantity of green vegetable material identified and offered for consumption as being marijuana by the occupant of 7164 Meadowpark occupant being Alan Buchanan.

"Affiant further informs the court that Alan Buchanan has previously been arrested on drug violations by the Sheriff's Office East Baton Rouge Parish on 4-74 for distribution of methaqualone and on 9-74 for possesion (sic) of marijuana by the Sheriff's Office East Baton Rouge Parish."

The search warrant was issued.

In executing the warrant law officers entered the premises and seized two shotguns, two .22 caliber rifles, approximately one pound of marijuana, five vials of liquid phenobarbital, numerous syringes, and approximately one gram of heroin.

Defendants moved to suppress these items. The district court denied their motion, and defendants applied to this Court for writs of review and certiorari. We granted the writs to determine if the warrant had been issued without probable cause. La.Const.1974, art. I, § 5.

A search warrant may issue only upon probable cause established to the satisfaction of the judge, by the affidavit of a credible person, reciting facts establishing the cause for issuance of the warrant. La.C.Cr.P. art. 162. Probable cause exists when the facts and circumstances within the affiant's knowledge, and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient to support a reasonable belief that an offense has been committed and that evidence or contraband may be found at the place to be searched. State v. Boksham, 370 So.2d 491 (La.1979); State v. Koncir, 367 So.2d 365 (La.1979); State v. Turnipseed, 362 So.2d 486 (La.1978); State v. Richards, 357 So.2d 1128 (La.1978). Thus, included within the general concept of probable cause is the necessary element of a reasonable belief that the contraband or evidence will not be disposed of but will remain at the place to be searched at the time of the proposed search. State v. Thompson, 354 So.2d 513 (La.1978); State v. Brawley, 347 So.2d 238 (La.1977).

In the instant case the affidavit fails to establish probable cause to believe that the evidence or contraband observed by the informant at the defendants' residence was not disposed of but remained at the place to be searched. A...

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • State v. Groves
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • December 13, 1991
    ... ... Accord State v. Juhl, 234 Neb. 33, 449 N.W.2d 202 (1989) ...         Some courts have determined that probable cause dissipates rather rapidly when small, or unspecified, amounts of narcotics or controlled substances are involved. See, State v. Boneventure, 374 So.2d 1238 (La.1979) (when the search warrant affidavit stated that 2 days before issuance of the warrant, "a quantity" of marijuana was offered for consumption in defendants' residence, there was no basis for a reasonable belief that the marijuana was still in the defendants' residence at the ... ...
  • State v. Bruno
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • February 23, 1983
    ...shortly after its issuance. See State v. Tate, 407 So.2d 1133 (La.1981); State v. Tate, 407 So.2d 1131 (La.1981); State v. Boneventure, 374 So.2d 1238 (La.1979); State v. Thompson, 354 So.2d 513 In the case at bar, we are confronted with a related but different question of staleness. Our co......
  • State v. Ragsdale
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • March 3, 1980
    ... ... State v. Boneventure (and Buchanan), 374 So.2d 1238 (La.1979); State v. Morgan, supra. Also, as a general rule, a warrantless search is, per se, unreasonable absent one of the well-delineated exceptions. State v. Lain, 347 So.2d 167 (La.1977); State v. Aguillard, 357 So.2d 535 (La.1978); Coolidge v. N. H., supra ... ...
  • State v. Cann
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • December 15, 1980
    ... ... The arrest of defendant for alleged criminal acts unrelated to the specific incident reported by the informant is entitled to no weight in appraising the magistrate's decision to issue a warrant. State v. Boneventure, 374 So.2d 1238 (La.1979). That the informant gave the officers information of unknown content which matched data ... obtained from other informers, whose basis of knowledge and veracity were not set forth in the affidavit, is an unsatisfactory basis upon which to establish any factual indicia ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT