Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-929-605-4013

State v. Boykin

Document Justia Case Summary Cited authorities 16 Cited in 19 Precedent Map Related
Docket Number2012-0808
Decision Date22 October 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
46 cases
  • State v. Radcliff
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • January 28, 2015
    ... ... 28 N.E.3d 71 Yeura R. Venters, Franklin County Public Defender, and Timothy E. Pierce and John W. Keeling, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant. O'CONNOR, C.J. 142 Ohio St.3d 79 { 1} In this appeal, we answer questions that were not addressed in our recent decision in State v. Boykin, 138 Ohio St.3d 97, 2013-Ohio-4582, 4 N.E.3d 980, which held that "[a] gubernatorial pardon does not automatically entitle the recipient to have the record of the pardoned conviction sealed." Id. at syllabus. { 2} We are presented with a certified conflict between the decision of the Tenth ... ...
  • State v. Campbell
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • August 18, 2020
    ... ... 3164. {28} After the issuance of the decisions in Helton and Samson it is evident that the terms of House Bill 4 provide more protection to a probationer/parolee than what is required by the Fourth Amendment and we acknowledge this is the Legislature's prerogative. State v. Boykin , 9th Dist. Summit No. 25752, 2012-Ohio-1381, 2012 WL 1072305, 7 aff'd, 157 N.E.3d 381 138 Ohio St.3d 97, 2013-Ohio-4582, 4 N.E.3d 980, 7 (2013), quoting In re Application to Seal Record of No Bill, 131 Ohio App.3d 399, 403, 722 N.E.2d 602 (3d Dist.1999). Some Ohio statutes provide greater ... ...
  • Polk v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • October 9, 2014
    ... ... Irrespective of the pardon, the statute was deemed invalid on other constitutional grounds. The courts, both federal and state, have thus accurately 150 So.3d 970described the blotting out discussion in Garland as dictum.In re Abrams, 689 A.2d 6, 17 (D.C.App.1997). See also State v. Boykin, 138 Ohio St.3d 97, 10304, 4 N.E.3d 980 (2013) (finding Garland 's language that a pardon reaches both the punishment prescribed for the offence, and the guilt of the offender as simply dicta); R.J.L. v. State, 887 So.2d 1268, 1275 (Fla.2004) (recognizing Garland 's language as dicta and holding ... ...
  • State v. Thacker
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • December 13, 2024
    ... ... See Ohio Const., art. III, § 11 (granting ... governor power to "grant ... pardons, for all crimes ... and offenses, except treason and cases of impeachment, upon ... such conditions as the governor may think proper"); ... State v. Boykin, 2013-Ohio-4582, ¶ 19 ... ("the legislature may not prescribe substantive ... regulations concerning the governor's discretion in ... granting a pardon") ...          {¶101} ... Further, R.C. 2923.14(F)(3) permits the court that removed a ... petitioner's disability to "revoke[]" ... ...
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT