State v. Brown
| Decision Date | 06 October 1923 |
| Docket Number | 24,977 |
| Citation | State v. Brown, 114 Kan. 452, 219 P. 279 (Kan. 1923) |
| Parties | STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. O. F. BROWN, Appellant |
| Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Decided July, 1923.
Appeal from Reno district court; WILLIAM G. FAIRCHILD, judge.
Judgment affirmed.
SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.
1. CRIMINAL LAW--Motion for Change of Venue Properly Overruled. A motion for a change of venue on the ground of local prejudice and the bias of the trial judge is held to have been properly overruled.
2. SAME--Disqualification of Juror--Conflicting Oral Evidence--Question of Fact for Trial Court. Where in a criminal prosecution a juror in the course of examination as to his qualifications states that he has neither formed nor expressed an opinion on the merits of the case and after a conviction affidavits are filed of his having previously expressed a belief that the defendant was guilty, which are denied by his own affidavit, the overruling of a motion for a new trial on the ground of his disqualification is not subject to review, because the decision must be regarded as influenced to some extent by the appearance and manner of the juror while testifying on his voir dire.
Eustace Smith, J. R. Beeching, and William H. Burnett, all of Hutchinson, for the appellant.
C. B Griffith, attorney-general, John F. Rhodes, and H. F. Brown, county attorney, for the appellee; R. C. Davis, and Don Shaffer, both of Hutchinson, of counsel.
On January 22, 1923, O. F. Brown was convicted of an assault upon Carmen Trabulse with intent to commit rape. He appeals.
1. Complaint is made of the overruling of a motion for a change of venue on the grounds that public opinion had been so inflamed against the defendant as to prevent his having a fair trial in the county and that the district judge was prejudiced against him.
The defendant in his verified motion said that bitter and inflammatory newspaper articles charging him with being guilty had been published in the county, causing the employment of counsel to assist the county attorney in the prosecution, and that by reason of such articles the American Legion had a public meeting at which false statements were made against him, resolutions condemning him were passed, and additional counsel to assist the state were employed. Evidence was introduced of the use of the following headlines in a Hutchinson paper during the latter part of October, 1922: "Brown Case May Come Up This Term."
In addition, the following six paragraphs were shown to have been published in the same paper during the months of December and January:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Wright v. Bernstein
...Accident, etc., Corp., 8 Cir., 42 F.2d 48; James v. State, 68 Ark. 464, 60 S.W. 29; State v. Cleary, 40 Kan. 287, 19 P. 776; State v. Brown, 114 Kan. 452, 219 P. 279; Schmidt v. Rose, 60 Mo.App. 579; Hayes v. Thompson, N.Y., 15 Abb.Prac., N.S., 220; Burden v. Stephens, 174 Okl. 312, 49 P.2d......
-
Kuzminski v. Waser
...& Life Assur. Corp., [8 Cir.], 42 F.2d 48;James v. State, 68 Ark. 464, 60 S.W. 29;State v. Cleary, 40 Kan. 287, 19 P. 776;State v. Brown, 114 Kan. 452, 219 P. 279; Schmidt v. Rose, 6 Mo.App. 579; Hayes v. Thompson, N.Y., 15 Abb.Prac., N.S., 220; Burden v. Stephens, 174 Okl. 312, 49 P.2d 109......
-
Maher v. New York, C. & St. L.R. Co.
...Accident, etc., Corp. (C.C.A.) 42 F.(2d) 48;James v. State, 68 Ark. 464, 60 S.W. 29;State v. Cleary, 40 Kan. 287, 19 P. 776;State v. Brown, 114 Kan. 452, 219 P. 279; Schmidt v. Rose, 6 Mo.App. 579; Hayes v. Thompson (N.Y.) 15 Abb.Prac.(N.S.) 220;Burden v. Stephens, 174 Okl. 312, 49 P.(2d) 1......
-
State v. Zakoura
... ... appeal." (Syl. 1.) ... In ... accord with the case just cited are State v ... Bancroft, 22 Kan. 170; State v. Bassnett, 80 ... Kan. 392, 102 P. 461; State v. McLemore, 99 Kan ... 777, 164 P. 161; State v. Henson, 103 Kan. 581, 587, ... 185 P. 1059; State v. Brown, 114 Kan. 452, 219 P ... 279; State v. Mendenhall, 133 Kan. 664, 3 P.2d 489 ... In this ... case most of the evidence on the question of Duncan's ... qualifications was in writing, and this court has read the ... whole of it pro and con with painstaking care; and in so far ... ...