State v. Brown
| Citation | 488 P.2d 856,6 Or.App. 523 |
| Parties | STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. James Philip BROWN, Appellant. |
| Decision Date | 30 November 1971 |
| Court | Court of Appeals of Oregon |
J. Marvin Kuhn, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., and John W. Osburn, Sol. Gen., Salem.
Before SCHWAB, C.J., and FOLEY and FORT, JJ.
Affirmed from the bench.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
State v. Heald
...obvious legislative purpose of deterrence and rehabilitation which the broad language of the enactment indicates. See State v. Brown, 6 Or.App. 523, 488 P.2d 856 (1971). The federal courts have reached a similar conclusion in their interpretation of 18 U.S.C.App. § 1202(a)(1). That statute ......
-
Burkett v. State
...920, 93 S.Ct. 1362, 35 L.Ed.2d 582 (1973) (arson conviction pending on appeal could be used as the predicate felony); State v. Brown, 6 Or.App. 523, 488 P.2d 856 (1971), reversed on other grounds, 262 Or. 442, 497 P.2d 1191 (1972) ("policy considerations underlying the prohibition against c......