State v. Brown
Decision Date | 02 July 1935 |
Docket Number | No. 26435.,26435. |
Citation | 196 N.E. 696,208 Ind. 562 |
Parties | STATE v. BROWN. |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Omer W. Brown was indicted for altering, forging, and increasing a claim, made and filed in his office as county auditor, and causing presentation to county board of commissioners of false and fraudulent claim on account for services pretended to have been rendered by claimant, and, from a judgment quashing the indictment, the state appeals.
Affirmed.
Appeal from Randolph Circuit Court; Alonzo L. Bales, Judge.
Russell E. Wise, of Union City, Nathan Mendenhall, of Winchester, Philip Lutz, Jr., of Boonville, and Ralph E. Hanna, of Delphi, for the State.
George H. Ward and Frederick S. Caldwell, both of Winchester, for appellee.
The following indictment was returned against appellee:
‘Indictment for Presenting False Claims.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pruitt v. State
...his defense and to assure that he will not twice be put in jeopardy for the same crime. Ind.Const. art. I, § 13; See State v. Brown (1935), 208 Ind. 562, 196 N.E. 696. However, certain details may be omitted and a motion to quash may properly be denied unless the indictment is so uncertain ......
-
Defries v. State
...his defense and to assure that he will not twice be put in jeopardy for the same crime. Ind.Const. art. I, § 13; See State v. Brown (1935), 208 Ind. 562, 196 N.E. 696. However, certain details may be omitted and a motion to quash may properly be denied unless the indictment is so uncertain ......
-
Defries v. State
...his defense and to assure that he will not twice be put in jeopardy for the same crime. Ind.Const. art. I, § 13; See State v. Brown (1935), 208 Ind. 562, 196 N.E. 696. However, certain details may be omitted and a motion to quash may properly be denied unless the indictment is so uncertain ......
-
Bailey v. State, 3--873A106
...his defense and to assure that he will not twice be put in jeopardy for the same crime. Ind.Const. (A)rt. I, § 13; See State v. Brown (1935), 208 Ind. 562, 196 N.E. 696. However, certain details may be omitted and a motion to quash may properly be denied unless the indictment is so uncertai......