State v. Brown
| Decision Date | 01 March 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 53997-9,53997-9 |
| Citation | 787 P.2d 906 |
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
| Parties | The STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. James Artis BROWN, Petitioner. |
Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration seeks clarification of the use of the word "majority" in the concurring opinions of Justice Utter and Justice Pearson. The official headnotes accurately reflect the holdings of the Court. Therefore, it is hereby ordered that the concurring opinions in the above cause be changed as follows:
1. The word "majority" is deleted and the words "opinion by Justice Brachtenbach" are inserted in the following locations: the thirteenth line from the top of page 557 []; the eleventh and sixteenth lines from the bottom of page 557 []; the second, third, sixth, eighth, fourteenth, and sixteenth lines from the bottom of page 558 []; the second, seventh, thirteenth, and fifteenth lines from the top of page 559 []; the fourth and sixth lines from the bottom of page 559 []; and the first, tenth, fifteenth, and twenty-first lines from the top of page 560 [].
2. The word "majority's" is deleted and the words "in Justice Brachtenbach's opinion" are inserted in the following locations: the sixth and seventh (two instances) lines from the top of page 557 []; the third line from the bottom of page 559 []; the fourth line from the top of page 560 []; the tenth and seventeenth lines from the bottom of page 560 []; and the seventh line from the top of page 561 [].
3. The word "majority's" is deleted and the words "of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Herzog
...... She described a scar on his stomach and a two-heart tattoo on his left arm. She said he smoked cigarettes, and that he was wearing a short-sleeve shirt, blue jeans, and brown cowboy boots with a "chipped" heel. She described the pickup as tan in color, medium sized, with a four-wheel drive automatic transmission and an off-white canopy over the bed. She said the interior of the cab had bucket seats and "fuzzy" seat covers, cup holders between the seats, and ......
-
State v. Rivers
...... Further, the trial court must articulate, for the record, the factors which favor admission or exclusion of prior conviction evidence under ER 609(a)(1). State v. Jones, 101 Wash.2d 113, 122, 677 P.2d 131 (1984), overruled on other grounds by State v. Brown, 111 Wash.2d 124, 761 P.2d 588 (1988), adhered to on reh'g, 113 Wash.2d 520, 782 P.2d 1013, 80 A.L.R.4th 989, corrected, 787 P.2d 906 (1990); State v. Gomez, 75 Wash.App. 648, 651, 880 P.2d 65 (1994). . The responsibility of the trial court to state the factors considered under ......
-
State v. Jackson
....... 46 P.3d 260 Paul J. Wasson, Attorney at Law, Spokane, Counsel for Appellant. . Kevin M. Korsmo, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, Spokane, Counsel for Respondent. 46 P.3d 258 . 46 P.3d 259 OPINION PUBLISHED IN PART . BROWN, C.J. . William Bradley Jackson was convicted in Spokane County and given a 672-month exceptional sentence for the first degree murder of his 9-year-old daughter Valiree. Mr. Jackson seeks review of the trial court rulings (A) denying a venue change, (B) failing to suppress ......
-
State v. Ray
...... In this case, the defendant testified at trial. The trial court's ruling was not pursuant to ER 609 and the court here did not have to perform the on-the-record balancing that ER 609 requires. Brown, 113 Wash.2d at 533, 782 P.2d 1013. Further, the evidence Ray offered was exculpatory and he arguably would not have the same incentive to "abuse ER 609" as the defendant trying to exclude damaging information about his past criminal history. LeFever does not compel the conclusion that Ray's ......