State v. Brown
Decision Date | 08 June 1957 |
Docket Number | No. 40300,40300 |
Citation | 312 P.2d 832,181 Kan. 375 |
Parties | STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Joseph Zebedee BROWN, Appellant. |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court
1. Where separate and distinct felonies are charged in separate counts of one and the same information, and all of the offenses charged are of the same general character, requiring the same mode of trial, the same kind of evidence, and the same kind of punishment, it is held that the defendant may be tried upon all of the several counts of the information at one and the same time, and in one trial.
2. Whether a defendant who is charged with several separate and distinct felonies, as related in the foregoing paragraph, may be tried upon all of the several counts of the information at one and the same time, and in one trial, rests in the sound judicial discretion of the trial court.
3. Where the state relies on a written voluntary confession as evidence to prove the commission of several separate and distinct felonies upon which conviction is sought, the state is not required to file separate informations on each offense and thereby defeat a prosecution of the second offense by virtue of G.S.1949, 62-1449.
4. Where a defendant is charged with rape in one count and kidnaping in the first degree in another count, both growing out of one comprehensive plan, it is held that the defendant is properly charged under G.S.1949, 21-449, with kidnaping in the first degree--there being no defect in the charge on the ground that rape supplied the element of bodily harm required in proof of kidnaping in the first degree.
5. G.S.1949, 21-449, construed as more fully set out in the opinion, denounces two acts as kidnaping in the first degree. The one is kidnaping with the intention of exacting ransom or reward and the other is kidnaping if bodily harm is in any way inflicted upon the person or persons kidnaped.
6. The testimony of an absent witness may be admitted in evidence when such testimony has been taken at a preliminary hearing, where the testimony at the prior hearing was given under oath and the defendant was confronted by the witness and had the right to cross-examine, provided the record discloses that a proper foundation has been established for the admission of such evidence.
7. Where the admission of the testimony of an absent witness given at a prior hearing, as related in the foregoing paragraph, is dependent upon the establishment of a proper foundation is evidence, it is held that bare statements of counsel are not entitled to the dignity of evidence and do not constitute the proof required to establish a proper foundation for the admission of such evidence. Under such circumstances, the admission of the testimony of an absent complaining witness has materially prejudiced the substantial rights of the defendant and is reversible error.
William H. Towers and Myles C. Stevens, Kansas City, and Elisha Scott, Topeka, argued the cause, Harry Hayward, Kansas City, was with them on the briefs for appellant.
Newell A. George, Asst. County Atty., and James P. Davis, Asst. County Atty., Kansas City, argued the causes, John Anderson, Jr., Atty. Gen., Paul Wilson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Donald E. Martin, County Atty., and Robert A. Foster, Asst. County Atty., Kansas City, were with them on the briefs for appellee.
This is a criminal action in which the defendant, Joseph Zebedee Brown, appellant herein, was tried and convicted on three separate counts: kidnaping in the first degree, forcible rape, and assault with intent to rape. From the verdict and judgment entered against him, the defendant appeals to this court, specifying as error certain rulings of the court.
Trial began on the 30th day of January, 1956, and concluded with a verdict on the 9th day of February, 1956.
Mrs. Harris, one of the complaining witnesses in this criminal action, lived at 3617 Freeman Avenue, Kansas City, Kansas. She was a white woman and at the time of the trial was fifty-seven years old. After she got off from her work on February 21, 1955, at about 9:00 o'clock p. m., she went to her car which was in a parking lot at Eighth and Nebraska, Kansas City, Kansas. When she sat down in her car, some man stepped up from behind, opened the door, slid into the driver's seat and forced Mrs. Harris over to the other side of the car with a gun. She asked the man, 'What are you going to do?' The man said, 'Be quiet and you won't get hurt.' Mrs. Harris worked at the Bodker's Clothing Store. She stated that the man, later identified as the defendant--a nineteen-year-old colored youth, drove her automobile out of the parking lot without her consent. He drove up and down streets and finally drove down an alley and behind a building in which the Nebraska Waste Paper Company was located.
According to the testimony of Mrs. Harris, the defendant said, 'I don't want your money, I don't want your car.' She then asked the defendant, 'What do you want?' and he said 'I am going to rape you.'
After the defendant turned in behind the said building, he stopped the car and told Mrs. Harris to take off her clothing. This she refused to do. Then, the defendant forced her to the opposite side of the car and hit her on the shoulder with a gun. Mrs. Harris testified that the defendant took off her undergarments and forced her at the point of a gun to have sexual relationship with him.
After this incident, Mrs. Harris was released by the defendant at a stop light, where he jumped out of the car and ran off into the darkness. She went to a tavern and called the police. A detective named Don Adams, answered the call and took Mrs. Harris to her son's home.
Later Mrs. Harris went to police headquarters and identified defendant in a lineup of five men. Mrs. Harris testified at the trial that the defendant was the man that she identified at police headquarters, and she pointed him out in the courtroom as the man who raped her.
On the night of February 28, 1955, exactly one week after the foregoing incident, Mrs. Ruth Brakey was assaulted. Mrs. Brakey lived in North Kansas City, Missouri, at 2815 East 56th Street and worked at Maslan's Department Store in Kansas City, Kansas. At approximately 9:00 o'clock p. m., on the 28th day of February, she went to the alley after work to get into her parked car. As she got in from the right side a man who wore a mask and had a revolver in his hand tried to get into her car from the left side. Mrs. Brakey kicked so furiously that she kicked the mask off the man and got a good look at him. In the process she screamed and attracted the attention of persons nearby. The defendant escaped into the darkness and later Mrs. Brakey picked the defendant out at police headquarters and identified him as the man who attempted to get into her car.
Don Adams, a detective working out of the police department of Kansas City, Kansas, met Mrs. Harris on the night of February 21, 1955, at a tavern located at 11th and Quindaro in Kansas City, Kansas, pursuant to a call he had received from headquarters. He related that Mrs. Harris was nervous, excited, crying and emotionally upset at the time.
Subsequently, on the 28th day of February, 1955, Mr. Adams saw the defendant, Joseph Zebedee Brown, at the detective bureau headquarters where he had conversation with him. At that time the defendant made a statement in writing as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Binder v. Construction and General Laborers Local Union No. 685
...court wherein the appellant's version of the 'evidence' was narrated from statements of counsel made in the trial court. In State v. Brown, 181 Kan. 375, 312 P.2d 832, a conviction in a criminal case was reversed because a foundation for the admission of the transcript of testimony of an ab......
-
Requests of Governor and Senate on Constitutionality of Act No. 294 of Public Acts of 1972, In re
...17, 174 N.E. 96 (1930) (Impairment refers to total or partial loss of function of member or of body as a whole).State of Kansas v. Brown, 181 Kan. 375, 312 P.2d 832 (1957) (Bodily harm).Northwestern Barb Wire Co. v. Industrial Commission, 353 Ill. 371, 187 N.E. 468 (1933) (Permanently cease......
-
People v. Adams, Docket No. 3940
...13 Stan.L.Rev. 252, 259, fn. 41 (1961).28 See People v. Florio (1950), 301 N.Y. 46, 92 N.E.2d 881, 17 A.L.R.2d 993; State v. Brown (1957), 181 Kan. 375, 312 P.2d 832; State v. Johnson (1961), 67 N.J.Super. 414, 170 A.2d 830.29 That in construing statutes courts avoid constructions which lea......
-
State v. Innis, 75-333-C
...to the commission of an underlying lesser crime." (Emphasis in original.) Id. at 214-15, 547 P.2d at 730. See also State v. Brown, 181 Kan. 375, 312 P.2d 832 (1957). Hence, the court drew a distinction between confinement that was "merely incidental" to another crime and confinement that "f......