State v. Bulloch

Decision Date15 May 1922
Docket Number25194
Citation92 So. 127,151 La. 593
CourtLouisiana Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE v. BULLOCH

Appeal from Twenty-Fifth Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa; Robert S. Ellis, Judge.

Henry Bulloch was convicted of selling intoxicating liquors, and he appeals.

Verdict and sentence set aside, information quashed, and accused discharged.

Ponder & Ponder, of Franklinton, for appellant.

A. V. Coco, Atty. Gen., M. J. Allen, Dist. Atty., of Amite, and T. S. Walmsley, of New Orleans, for the State.

OPINION

THOMPSON, J.

The defendant appeals from a conviction and sentence for violating Act No. 39 of 1921, known as the "Hood Bill." The information filed by the district attorney charges that the defendant "willfully and unlawfully did sell intoxicating liquors." It was urged in a motion in arrest of judgment, among other things, that the information did not set out any offense known to the laws of the state of Louisiana. The motion was overruled, and a bill of exception was reserved.

The act under which the prosecution is had prohibits "the sale," etc., of intoxicating liquors for "beverage purposes," while the charge against the accused is that he sold intoxicating liquors, without the additional necessary element "for beverage purposes." It is elementary that in all prosecutions for statutory offenses the indictment or information must follow the language of the statute or language equivalent to that used in the statute.

In State v. Ackerman, 51 La.Ann. 1213, 26 So. 80, it was said that an indictment under a statute ought with certainty and precision charge the defendant with having committed the acts under the circumstances and with the intent mentioned in the statute. If any of the ingredients are missing, the indictment is not good. The information in this case did not follow the language of Act 39 of 1921. The failure to add the words "for beverage purposes" or any other words having an equivalent meaning was a fatal defect.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the verdict and sentence be set aside, that the information be quashed, and the accused discharged.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State v. Varnado
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • 11 December 1944
    ...is sufficient for the indictment to follow the language of the statute or language equivalent to that used in the statute. State v. Bulloch, 151 La. 593, 92 So. 127. And it another familiar rule of jurisprudence that, if the indictment does not sufficiently set forth the acts charged agains......
  • State v. Pridgen
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • 24 May 1937
    ... ... Section ... 1, Act No. 39, Extra Session of 1921, known as the "Hood ... Bill," made it a [187 La. 574] misdemeanor to ... manufacture, sell, or in any manner dispose of intoxicating ... liquors within the state "for beverage purposes." ... In ... State v. Bulloch, 151 La. 593, 92 So. 127, the defendant ... was prosecuted for selling liquor, the bill charging that he ... "willfully and unlawfully did sell intoxicating ... liquors." He was convicted and filed a motion in arrest ... of judgment on the ground that the bill of information ... "did not set ... ...
  • State v. McClellan
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • 5 November 1923
    ... ... requirement; but the rule is well settled that, in ... prosecutions for purely statutory offenses, it is sufficient ... for the indictment or information to follow the language of ... the statute or language equivalent to that used in the ... statute. State v. Bulloch, 151 La. 593, 594, 92 So ... 127. And it is another familiar rule of jurisprudence that, ... if the indictment does not sufficiently set forth the acts ... charged against the defendant particularly in matters of ... description, he waives the defect, if he fails to ask for a ... bill of ... ...
  • State v. Cruse
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • 29 December 1922
    ... ... possessed it for sale for such purposes, or that he even ... possessed or transported it for nonbeverage purposes, without ... the proper permit, but is silent in these respects, it is ... clear that the affidavit charges no offense. Sections 1 and 3 ... of Act 39 of 1921; State v. Bulloch, 151 La. 593, 92 ... It may ... be said in conclusion that, in preparing a new affidavit, as ... the charge of unlawfully transporting the intoxicating ... liquor, [152 La. 987] etc., and that of selling it, etc., are ... each distinct offenses, and are subject to different ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT