State v. Carter
Decision Date | 10 August 2022 |
Docket Number | 28104,Appellate Case 2021-000632 |
Parties | The State, Respondent, v. David Matthew Carter, Petitioner. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Heard June 8, 2022
Appeal from Lancaster County Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge
Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Senior Assistant Attorney General David Spencer, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Randy E. Newman Jr., of Lancaster, all for Respondent.
We granted a petition for a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in State v. Carter, 433 S.C. 352, 857 S.E.2d 910 (Ct. App. 2021). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.[1]
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
BEATTY, KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and Acting Justice William H. Seals, Jr, concur ---------
[1] We note that during oral argument, Petitioner's primary focus was on whether the procedure employed by the trial court violated his right to confront his accuser. See generally U.S. Const. amend. VI ("In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to be confronted with the witnesses against him ...."). Previously, Petitioner's argument on appeal was one of statutory interpretation, specifically, the meaning of the phrase "very young" in section 16-3-1550(E) of the South Carolina Code (2015) (). Our disposition of this case should in no manner be viewed as a comment one way or the other on the merits of Petitioner's Confrontation Clause argument.
---------
To continue reading
Request your trial