State v. Charles
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Citation | State v. Charles, 304 Conn. 930, 42 A.3d 392 (Conn. 2012) |
| Decision Date | 02 May 2012 |
| Parties | STATE of Connecticut v. Jared CHARLES. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Darcy McGraw, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
Melissa L. Streeto, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 134 Conn.App. 242, 39 A.3d 750, is denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
Charles v. Commissioner of Correction
...after the [petitioner] and [Jayquan] fled the scene." State v. Charles , 134 Conn. App. 242, 244–45, 39 A.3d 750, cert. denied, 304 Conn. 930, 42 A.3d 392 (2012). The petitioner was convicted of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a, carrying a pistol without a permit in violati......
-
State v. Opio-Oguta
... ... See State v. Maskiell , 100 Conn. App. 507, 520-21, 918 A.2d 293, cert. denied, 282 Conn. 922, 925 A.2d 1104 (2007); State v. Santiago , 100 Conn. App. 236, 254, n.10, 917 A.2d 1051, cert. denied, 284 Conn. 933, 935 A.2d 152, 153 (2007); but see State v. Charles , 134 Conn. App. 242, 250 n.5, 39 A.3d 750, cert. denied, 304 Conn. 930, 42 A.3d 390 (2012). "[The plain error] doctrine, codified at Practice Book § 60-5, is an extraordinary remedy used by the appellate courts to rectify errors committed at trial that, although unpreserved, are ... ...
-
State v. Bellamy
...with the charge." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In State v. Charles, 134 Conn. App. 242, 252, 39 A.3d 750, cert. denied, 304 Conn. 930, 42 A.3d 392 (2012), we held that a defendant had waived the right to challenge jury instructions where "defense counsel had a meaningful opportunity ......
- Farren v. Farren
