State v. Chatham County, 38685
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | JORDAN |
| Citation | State v. Chatham County, 119 S.E.2d 120, 103 Ga.App. 390 (Ga. App. 1961) |
| Decision Date | 03 March 1961 |
| Docket Number | No. 2,No. 38685,38685,2 |
| Parties | STATE of Georgia, etc. v. CHATHAM COUNTY et al |
Syllabus by the Court
The trial court erred in dismissing the petition of the State of Georgia seeking the confirmation and validation of certain county bonds under the provisions of Chapter 87-3 of the Georgia Code.
The petition of the State of Georgia, filed in its behalf by the Solicitor General of the Eastern Judicial Circuit on October 13, 1960 in the Superior Court of Chatham County, for the confirmation and validation of certain described serial bonds in the amount of $1,000,000, alleged the following material facts: On November 4, 1952, a proposed amendment (Ga.L.1951, p. 833) to Article VII, Section VII, Par. 1 of the Constitution of Georgia (Code Ann. § 2-6001) was voted on and ratified by the qualified voters of this State in the general election held on that date. Section 1 of said amendment provided:
Pursuant to this amendment the Commissioners of Chatham County and Ex Officio Judges thereof on October 6, 1960 passed a resolution authorizing the issuance of said bonds in the amount of $1,000,000 to be known as 'Chatham County Tybee Road Bonds for 1960.' On October 13, 1960, the commissioners pensonally notified the solicitor-general to institute the instant proceedings for the purpose of confirming and validating said bonds.
The petition further alleged that the proceeds from the sale of said bonds would be used for the purposes of 'obtaining rights-of-way necessary for the widening and/or constructing and building of roads, the building of new roads, the opening, grading, repaving, reconstructing and resurfacing of roads, and for purchasing, condemning and/or acquiring of rights of way and improvements, the building of bridges and approaches thereto, and all things necessary and/or useful in connection with the roadway known as President Street Extension for Savannah Beach Expressway and Spur to Savannah Beach, Tybee Island, Georgia.'
The trial court on October 13, 1960, allowed the petition filed and ordered the County of Chatham to show cause on October 21, 1960 why said bonds should not be confirmed and validated as prayed. Chatham County filed its answer admitting the allegations of the petition.
On the date set for the hearing S. L. Peters, as a citizen and taxpayer of Chatham County, acting pursuant to the provisions of Code § 87-304, filed an intervention in the present proceedings in which he objected to the validation of the bonds on two grounds: (1) that the laws of this State require that the governing body of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Sears v. State
...the election notice.' Lilly v. Crisp County School System, 117 Ga.App. 868, 872, 162 S.E.2d 456, 460. See, State of Georgia v. Chatham County, 103 Ga.App. 390, 394, 119 S.E.2d 120. We conclude that the requirement of the 1973 Act is merely that the validation petition state the purpose of t......
-
Dixie Seed Co. v. Smith
... ... The instant petition did not state a cause of action ex delicto for fraud and deceit since it is not alleged ... ...