State v. Cheung
Decision Date | 14 February 2000 |
Citation | 746 A.2d 38,328 NJ Super. 368 |
Parties | STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Andrew G. CHEUNG, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | New Jersey Superior Court |
Ivelisse Torres, Public Defender, for defendant-appellant (Alison Perrone, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, of counsel and on the brief).
John J. Farmer, Jr., Attorney General, for plaintiff-respondent (Steven A. Yomtov, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).
Before Judges STERN and STEINBERG. The opinion of the court was delivered by STERN, P.J.A.D
Defendant pled guilty to first-degree armed robbery and two counts of burglary. Defendant admitted his liability as an accomplice. Pursuant to a negotiated disposition, he was sentenced under N.J.S.A. 2C:44-1f(2) to an eight-year term in the custody of the Commissioner of Corrections for the armed robbery with 85% to be served before parole eligibility under the No Early Release Act, N.J.S.A. 2C:43-7.2 ("NERA"), and to concurrent sentences on the burglaries. The balance of the indictment and other charges were dismissed.
On this appeal defendant argues that NERA "does not apply to unarmed accomplices" or to someone who uses or threatens the use of a BB gun during an armed robbery because a "BB gun is not a deadly weapon for purposes of [NERA]."
We express our reservation about the cognizability of this appeal. In pleading guilty, defendant acknowledged the application of NERA1 and was sentenced thereunder. He now seeks to vacate the parole ineligibility term but "does not challenge the validity of his guilty plea." Thus, defendant's "argument on appeal is limited to contesting the applicability of the No Early Release Act" while seeking to maintain an eight-year, specific-term sentence that was recommended by the prosecutor based on the application of NERA.
145 N.J. 373, 678 A.2d 714 (1996).
We need not pursue the question further, however, because we reject defendant's contentions on the merits by adhering to our opinions in State v. Meyer, supra,
("deadly weapon" for purposes of NERA), and that a pellet gun or BB gun is a State v. Rumblin, 326 N.J.Super. 296, 303, 741 A.2d 138 (App.Div.1999) ( ). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and sentence imposed. However, we remand to the Law Division to amend the judgment in three respects.
First, the judgment should reflect the five-year term of parole supervision mandated by NERA, N.J.S.A. 2C:43-7.2(c), which defendant challenged at the trial level (but not before us) as "unconstitutional... double jeopardy." We add that, although the matter was downgraded for sentencing under N.J.S.A. 2C:44-1f(2), defendant was "sentenced for a crime of the first degree," N.J.S.A. 2C:43-7.2(c), thereby requiring a five-, not a three-, year period of supervision. Cf. State v. O'Connor, 105 N.J. 399, 404-05, 522 A.2d 423 (1987)
( ); State v. Partusch, 214 N.J.Super. 473, 476-77, 519 A.2d 946 (App.Div.1987) (same); State v. Williams, 225 N.J.Super. 462, 464-65, 542 A.2d 964 (Law Div.1988) (...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Reorganization of Medical Inter-Insurance Exchange of New Jersey
... ... New Jersey State Medical Underwriters, Inc. (Medical Underwriters), a wholly owned subsidiary of intervenor, the Medical Society of New Jersey (MSNJ), contracted 746 ... ...