State v. Cianci

Decision Date28 March 1955
Docket NumberNo. A--136,A--136
Citation113 A.2d 176,18 N.J. 191
PartiesSTATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Emedio CIANCI, Defendant-Respondent.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, where the following Per curiam opinion was filed.

'Appeal is take from a trial court's denial of defendants application to correct an alleged illegal sentence. The history of this case is fully set forth in a previous opinion of this court decided March 26, 1954. The question here considered was not disposed of in that appeal. Defendant contends that the trial judge erred in sentencing him to a term of not more than 20 years nor less than 10 years on his conviction for Indictment No. 32 in that the indictment charges different substantive crimes each requiring a separate sentence.

'Indictment No. 32 charges defendant and others with violating (1) in the first count R.S. 2:166--1 and R.S. 2:176--5 and (2) in the second count R.S. 2:110--2 and R.S. 2:176--5 'R.S. 2:166--1 provides:

"Any person who shall forcibly take from the person of another, money or personal goods and chattels, of any value whatever, by violence or putting him in fear, and his aiders, procurers and abettors, shall be guilty of a high misdemeanor, and punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, or imprisonment at hard labor not exceeding fifteen years, or both.'

'R.S. 2:176--5 provides in part:

'Any person who shall commit or attempt to commit any assault, robbery, larceny, burglary or breaking and entering, when armed with or having in his possession any revolver, pistol, or other firearm, or other instrument of any kind known as a blackjack, sling shot, billy, sandclub, sandbag, bludgeon, metal knuckles, dagger, dirk, dangerous knife, stiletto, bomb or other high explosive shall, in addition to the punishment provided for the crime be punished on a first conviction by imprisonment for not more than five years; * * *. No such additional punishment shall be imposed unless the indictment shall have averred that the person was armed with or had in his possession any such instrument and conviction was had thereon.'

'R.S. 2:110--2 provides in part:

"Any person who shall commit an assault with intent to * * *commit * * * robbery * * * shall be guilty of a high misdemeanor, and punished by a fine not exceeding three thousand dollars or by imprisonment at hard labor not exceeding twelve years, or both.'

'Confusion arises in the prosecutor's argument with the contention that in effect but one crime has been committed and that basically Indictment No. 32 is so limited. A reading of the two counts obviously reveals the commission of two crimes: (1) of robbery where defendant was armed and (2) of an assault upon the victim.

'The sentence record does not specify what part of the sentence is levied on the first count and what part is levied on the second count. It reads:

"Defendant being placed to the Bar for sentence he is sentenced to State Prison at hard labor for a maximum term of twenty (20) years and a minimum term of ten (10) years and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Worbetz v. Goodman
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • November 13, 1957
    ...LaVera, 35 N.J.Super. 256, 113 A.2d 829 (App.Div.1955), certiorari denied 350 U.S. 853, 76 S.Ct. 95, 100 L.Ed. 758; cf. State v. Cianci, 18 N.J. 191, 113 A.2d 176 (1955)). These sentences could have been consecutive in nature (State v. Mahaney, 73 N.J.L. 53, 62 A. 265 (Sup.Ct.1905); In re D......
  • State v. Orlando
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • December 13, 1993
    ...than on specific sentences or specific counts of the indictment. See N.J.S.A. 2C:43-6b and N.J.S.A. 2C:43-7b. In State v. Cianci, 18 N.J. 191, 194, 113 A.2d 176 (1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 1000, 76 S.Ct. 555, 100 L.Ed. 864 (1956) and cert. denied 353 U.S. 940, 77 S.Ct. 819, 1 L.Ed.2d 763......
  • State v. Subin
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • January 11, 1988
    ...than on a specific sentence for a specific count of the indictment. See N.J.S.A. 2C:43-6b and N.J.S.A. 2C:43-7b. In State v. Cianci, 18 N.J. 191, 194, 113 A.2d 176 (1955), cert. den. 350 U.S. 1000, 76 S.Ct. 555, 100 L.Ed. 864 (1956) and 353 U.S. 940, 77 S.Ct. 819, 1 L.Ed.2d 763 (1957), our ......
  • State v. Rodriguez
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • August 1, 1984
    ...today does not conflict with New Jersey's policy against general aggregate sentencing for multiple convictions. In State v. Cianci, 18 N.J. 191, 113 A.2d 176 (1955), cert. den., 353 U.S. 940, 77 S.Ct. 819, 1 L.Ed.2d 763 (1957), affirmed on the Appellate Division opinion below, the Court fou......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT