State, Ex Rel. The Benedictine Sisters of Elizabeth v. City of Elizabeth

CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtVAN SYCKEL, J.
CitationState v. City of Elizabeth, 13 A. 5, 50 N.J.L 347 (N.J. 1888)
Decision Date15 February 1888
PartiesTHE STATE, EX REL. THE BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF ELIZABETH, v. THE CITY OF ELIZABETH ET AL

(Syllabus by the Court.)

On certiorari.

Argued at November term, 1887, before Justices DEPUE, VAN SYCKEL, and KNAPP.

Alward & Parrot, for plaintiffs. Frank Bergen, for defendant.

VAN SYCKEL, J. This is an application for a writ of certiorari to review an assessment made against the relators upon their lands in the city of Elizabeth, by the commissioners appointed under the Martin act. The ground upon which the writ is asked for is that the said lands assessed are entitled to be wholly exempt from assessment by force of an act of the legislature of this state. The report of the commissioners was filed, duly advertised, and an opportunity given to all parties interested to be heard before the circuit court of Union county, and thereafter confirmed. The third section of the Martin act provides that the report of assessment when so confirmed shall be final and conclusive upon the said city, and upon all persons owning or having any interest in or lien upon the said lands, and against all persons whomsoever. The tenth section provides that no writ of certiorari shall be allowed to contest or set aside any tax or assessment fixed by said commissioners, unless the party applies for the writ within six months after the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Pine Bluff Water & Light Co. v. City of Pine Bluff
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • March 28, 1896
    ...485; 77 Hun, 182; 27 N.Y.S. 881; 58 N.W. 1015; 25 N.Y.S. 322; id. 873; 138 Pa.St. 321; 21 A. 347; 55 N.W. 324; 27 P. 474; 19 D. C. R. 327; 13 A. 5; 37 N.W. 809; 23 281; id. 284; 28 P. 416; 25 N.E. 995; 45 N.W. 899. This view has been sanctioned by the U. S. Supreme Court, 5 Wall. 413. See a......
  • Holloway v. Pennsauken Tp.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • December 3, 1952
    ...proceedings, or an undue or excessive amount of assessment, or a mistake in the manner of making the assessments. State, etc. v. Elizabeth, 50 N.J.L. 347, 13 A. 5 (Sup.Ct.1888); Graham v. Ocean City, 98 N.J.L. 426, 119 A. 772 (Sup.Ct.1923); Delaware River Bridge, etc., Committee v. Township......
  • Holloway v. Pennsauken Tp.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • May 18, 1953
    ...to a statutory court, limitations on the use of the writ of Certiorari were recognized. In State ex rel. the Benedictine Sisters of Elizabeth v. Elizabeth, 50 N.J.L. 347, 13 A. 5 (Sup.Ct.1888), it was '* * * the cases in which an application for a review (by writ of Certiorari) can be favor......
  • Delaware River Bridge Railroad and Bridge Company v. The Township Committee of The Township of Haddon
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • January 31, 1927
    ...do not apply and laches cannot be successfully urged where, as here, the lands were not subject to assessment. Benedictine Sisters v. Elizabeth, 50 N. J. Law, 347, 13 A. 5; Meredith v. Perth Amboy, 63 N. J. Law, 520, 44 A. 971; Winants v. Jersey City, 42 N. J. Law, The assessments under rev......
  • Get Started for Free